← Cannock Chase (all cycles) · 2 May 2024 cohort
Cannock Chase 2024
Local elections held 2 May 2024.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 12 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 36 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labour Party | 23,278 | 44.5% | 21 | 58.3% | 17 | 47.2% | +4 |
| Conservative Party | 17,022 | 32.6% | 10 | 27.8% | 12 | 33.3% | -2 |
| Green Party | 8,796 | 16.8% | 5 | 13.9% | 6 | 16.7% | -1 |
| Reform UK | 1,799 | 3.4% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 2.8% | -1 |
| Independent | 1,141 | 2.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 169 | 0.3% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| ND | 57 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 52,262 | 100.0% | 36 | 100.0% | 36 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2024 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2024 election (current) and on the eve of it (2023), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Hawks Green with Rumer Hill · 3 seats · won at 37.8% · above quota
- Western Springs · 3 seats · won at 37.9% · above quota
- Cannock Park and Old Fallow · 3 seats · won at 40.5% · above quota
- Hednesford Pye Green · 3 seats · won at 40.6% · above quota
- Cannock Longford and Bridgtown · 3 seats · won at 42.6% · above quota
- Etching Hill and the Heath · 3 seats · won at 45.5% · above quota
- Hednesford Green Heath · 3 seats · won at 47.1% · above quota
- Heath Hayes and Wimblebury · 3 seats · won at 48.2% · above quota
- Brereton and Ravenhill · 3 seats · won at 50.2% · above quota
- Hednesford Hills and Rawnsley · 3 seats · won at 51.6% · above quota
- Chadsmoor · 3 seats · won at 55.5% · above quota
- Norton Canes · 3 seats · won at 59.2% · above quota
Race results
Hawks Green with Rumer Hill · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 37.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,375
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Haden, P. | Conservative Party | 610 | 14.8% | 44.4% | +19.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Fitgerald, A. | Conservative Party | 573 | 13.9% | 41.7% | +16.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Bullock, L. | Labour Party | 520 | 12.6% | 37.8% | +12.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Theodorou, P. | Conservative Party | 514 | 12.5% | 37.4% | — | |
| 5 | Aston, N. | Labour Party | 484 | 11.7% | 35.2% | — | |
| 6 | Bilbie, D. | Labour Party | 460 | 11.2% | 33.5% | — | |
| 7 | Dean, A. | Reform UK | 351 | 8.5% | 25.5% | — | |
| 8 | Beach, A. | Independent | 172 | 4.2% | 12.5% | — | |
| 9 | Jackson, A. | Green Party | 168 | 4.1% | 12.2% | — | |
| 10 | Harborow, C. | Independent | 146 | 3.5% | 10.6% | — | |
| 11 | Zukowska, A. | Green Party | 126 | 3.1% | 9.2% | — |
Western Springs · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 37.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,336
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lyons, O. | Conservative Party | 699 | 17.4% | 52.3% | +27.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Gaye, D. | Labour Party | 640 | 16.0% | 47.9% | +22.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hughes, G. | Conservative Party | 506 | 12.6% | 37.9% | +12.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Foceac, D. | Labour Party | 489 | 12.2% | 36.6% | — | |
| 5 | Arduino, L. | Conservative Party | 459 | 11.5% | 34.4% | — | |
| 6 | Pearson, S. | Labour Party | 448 | 11.2% | 33.5% | — | |
| 7 | Boyer, M. | Green Party | 341 | 8.5% | 25.5% | — | |
| 8 | Pyke, I. | Green Party | 257 | 6.4% | 19.2% | — | |
| 9 | Jenking, R. | Green Party | 169 | 4.2% | 12.6% | — |
Cannock Park and Old Fallow · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 40.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,546
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jones, V. | Conservative Party | 719 | 15.5% | 46.5% | +21.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Bancroft, J. | Conservative Party | 713 | 15.4% | 46.1% | +21.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Thornley, S. | Labour Party | 626 | 13.5% | 40.5% | +15.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Hill, N. | Labour Party | 609 | 13.1% | 39.4% | — | |
| 5 | Kenny, B. | Conservative Party | 599 | 12.9% | 38.7% | — | |
| 6 | Stanton, P. | Labour Party | 585 | 12.6% | 37.8% | — | |
| 7 | Carnell, P. | Reform UK | 390 | 8.4% | 25.2% | — | |
| 8 | Baptie, C. | Green Party | 209 | 4.5% | 13.5% | — | |
| 9 | Smith, M. | Green Party | 188 | 4.1% | 12.2% | — |
Hednesford Pye Green · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 40.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,389
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bishop, L. | Green Party | 583 | 14.0% | 42.0% | +17.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Mawle, D. | Green Party | 572 | 13.7% | 41.2% | +16.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Cartwright, S. | Labour Party | 564 | 13.5% | 40.6% | +15.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Johnson, P. | Labour Party | 548 | 13.2% | 39.5% | — | |
| 5 | Rock, R. | Green Party | 520 | 12.5% | 37.4% | — | |
| 6 | Harper, J. | Labour Party | 518 | 12.4% | 37.3% | — | |
| 7 | Bennett, E. | Conservative Party | 287 | 6.9% | 20.7% | — | |
| 8 | Taylor, M. | Conservative Party | 252 | 6.0% | 18.1% | — | |
| 9 | Young, H. | Conservative Party | 241 | 5.8% | 17.4% | — | |
| 10 | Ireland, D. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 81 | 1.9% | 5.8% | — |
Cannock Longford and Bridgtown · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 42.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,637
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Freeman, M. | Labour Party | 793 | 16.1% | 48.4% | +23.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hill, J. | Labour Party | 751 | 15.3% | 45.9% | +20.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Craddock, R. | Conservative Party | 697 | 14.2% | 42.6% | +17.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Pearson, A. | Labour Party | 675 | 13.7% | 41.2% | — | |
| 5 | Snape, P. | Conservative Party | 658 | 13.4% | 40.2% | — | |
| 6 | Kruskonjic, P. | Conservative Party | 651 | 13.3% | 39.8% | — | |
| 7 | Carmichael, A. | Green Party | 258 | 5.3% | 15.8% | — | |
| 8 | Cropp, E. | Green Party | 238 | 4.8% | 14.5% | — | |
| 9 | Kennedy, D. | Green Party | 191 | 3.9% | 11.7% | — |
Etching Hill and the Heath · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 45.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,681
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lyons, N. | Conservative Party | 802 | 15.9% | 47.7% | +22.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Sutherland, M. | Conservative Party | 798 | 15.8% | 47.5% | +22.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Johnston, J. | Conservative Party | 765 | 15.2% | 45.5% | +20.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Foley, D. | Labour Party | 708 | 14.0% | 42.1% | — | |
| 5 | Haywood, N. | Labour Party | 650 | 12.9% | 38.7% | — | |
| 6 | Galaska, D. | Labour Party | 607 | 12.0% | 36.1% | — | |
| 7 | Dudson, A. | Independent | 282 | 5.6% | 16.8% | — | |
| 8 | Beardmore, S. | Green Party | 158 | 3.1% | 9.4% | — | |
| 9 | Beardmore, K. | Green Party | 145 | 2.9% | 8.6% | — | |
| 10 | Cocker, W. | Green Party | 127 | 2.5% | 7.6% | — |
Hednesford Green Heath · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 47.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,208
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dunnett, M. | Labour Party | 675 | 18.6% | 55.9% | +30.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Prestwood, F. | Labour Party | 595 | 16.4% | 49.2% | +24.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Samuels, G. | Labour Party | 569 | 15.7% | 47.1% | +22.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Harrison, L. | Conservative Party | 418 | 11.5% | 34.6% | — | |
| 5 | Guy, D. | Conservative Party | 346 | 9.5% | 28.6% | — | |
| 6 | Deakin, M. | Reform UK | 323 | 8.9% | 26.7% | — | |
| 7 | Jones, P. | Conservative Party | 312 | 8.6% | 25.8% | — | |
| 8 | Green, A. | Green Party | 168 | 4.6% | 13.9% | — | |
| 9 | Green, R. | Green Party | 162 | 4.5% | 13.4% | — | |
| 10 | Turville, R. | ND | 57 | 1.6% | 4.7% | — |
Heath Hayes and Wimblebury · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 48.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,470
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wilson, L. | Labour Party | 737 | 16.7% | 50.1% | +25.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Aston, J. | Labour Party | 721 | 16.3% | 49.0% | +24.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Todd, D. | Labour Party | 708 | 16.1% | 48.2% | +23.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Thompson, S. | Conservative Party | 562 | 12.7% | 38.2% | — | |
| 5 | Priest, S. | Conservative Party | 494 | 11.2% | 33.6% | — | |
| 6 | Kirk, N. | Conservative Party | 431 | 9.8% | 29.3% | — | |
| 7 | Bernard, J. | Reform UK | 349 | 7.9% | 23.7% | — | |
| 8 | Hyde-Beardmore, S. | Green Party | 149 | 3.4% | 10.1% | — | |
| 9 | Kennedy, S. | Green Party | 136 | 3.1% | 9.3% | — | |
| 10 | Wallace, I. | Green Party | 123 | 2.8% | 8.4% | — |
Brereton and Ravenhill · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 50.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,413
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Boulton, C. | Labour Party | 916 | 21.6% | 64.8% | +39.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Fisher, P. | Labour Party | 903 | 21.3% | 63.9% | +38.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Williams, D. | Labour Party | 709 | 16.7% | 50.2% | +25.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Molineux, G. | Independent | 451 | 10.6% | 31.9% | — | |
| 5 | Kenny, J. | Conservative Party | 303 | 7.1% | 21.4% | — | |
| 6 | Parkes, J. | Conservative Party | 267 | 6.3% | 18.9% | — | |
| 7 | Hart, K. | Conservative Party | 264 | 6.2% | 18.7% | — | |
| 8 | Jackson, L. | Green Party | 160 | 3.8% | 11.3% | — | |
| 9 | Wilkinson, C. | Green Party | 135 | 3.2% | 9.6% | — | |
| 10 | Elson, K. | Green Party | 132 | 3.1% | 9.3% | — |
Hednesford Hills and Rawnsley · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 51.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,611
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Muckley, A. | Green Party | 924 | 19.1% | 57.3% | +32.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Elson, J. | Green Party | 908 | 18.8% | 56.4% | +31.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Page, H. | Green Party | 831 | 17.2% | 51.6% | +26.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Hewitt, P. | Conservative Party | 397 | 8.2% | 24.6% | — | |
| 5 | Birch, J. | Conservative Party | 390 | 8.1% | 24.2% | — | |
| 6 | Yaxley, T. | Conservative Party | 350 | 7.2% | 21.7% | — | |
| 7 | Price, I. | Labour Party | 326 | 6.7% | 20.2% | — | |
| 8 | Hunt, K. | Labour Party | 322 | 6.7% | 20.0% | — | |
| 9 | Williams, K. | Labour Party | 296 | 6.1% | 18.4% | — | |
| 10 | Whitehouse, L. | Independent | 90 | 1.9% | 5.6% | — |
Chadsmoor · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 55.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +30.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,404
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Johnson, T. | Labour Party | 851 | 20.2% | 60.6% | +35.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Prestwood, J. | Labour Party | 783 | 18.6% | 55.8% | +30.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Thornley, S. | Labour Party | 779 | 18.5% | 55.5% | +30.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Hunt, A. | Reform UK | 386 | 9.2% | 27.5% | — | |
| 5 | Jones, P. | Conservative Party | 333 | 7.9% | 23.7% | — | |
| 6 | Millward, G. | Conservative Party | 287 | 6.8% | 20.4% | — | |
| 7 | Rushton, H. | Conservative Party | 267 | 6.3% | 19.0% | — | |
| 8 | Hunneyball, E. | Green Party | 204 | 4.8% | 14.5% | — | |
| 9 | Donnallie, M. | Green Party | 171 | 4.1% | 12.2% | — | |
| 10 | Fostra, T. | Green Party | 150 | 3.6% | 10.7% | — |
Norton Canes · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 59.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +34.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,351
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Newbury, J. | Labour Party | 979 | 24.2% | 72.5% | +47.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Preece, J. | Labour Party | 935 | 23.1% | 69.2% | +44.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hill, J. | Labour Party | 799 | 19.7% | 59.2% | +34.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Hoare, M. | Conservative Party | 359 | 8.9% | 26.6% | — | |
| 5 | Bennett, D. | Conservative Party | 356 | 8.8% | 26.4% | — | |
| 6 | Clapham, T. | Conservative Party | 343 | 8.5% | 25.4% | — | |
| 7 | Crabtree, S. | Green Party | 98 | 2.4% | 7.3% | — | |
| 8 | Mawle, L. | Green Party | 95 | 2.3% | 7.0% | — | |
| 9 | Wainwright, P. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 88 | 2.2% | 6.5% | — |