Cannock Chase
Every election cycle we have data for, most recent first.
Cycles
- 2026 12 races · 13 seats 23.1% below quota
- 2024 12 races · 36 seats 0.0% below quota
- 2023 15 races · 17 seats 29.4% below quota
- 2022 13 races · 13 seats 69.2% below quota
- 2021 13 races · 13 seats 38.5% below quota
- 2019 15 races · 15 seats 60.0% below quota
- 2018 13 races · 13 seats 53.8% below quota
- 2016 13 races · 13 seats 84.6% below quota
Council composition as of 2026
37 councillors, by party. One square per seat. Source: opencouncildata annual snapshot — reflects the council at the end of 2026 (after that year's elections, by-elections and defections). Hover any seat for the party.
Most recent election (2026)
In 2026, 13 seats were up across 12 wards. The table below shows what each party actually won — alongside what they would have won if the 13 seats had been shared in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reform UK | 16,454 | 53.6% | 13 | 100.0% | 7 | 53.8% | +6 |
| Conservative Party | 5,190 | 16.9% | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 15.4% | -2 |
| Green Party | 4,726 | 15.4% | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 15.4% | -2 |
| Labour Party | 4,157 | 13.5% | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 15.4% | -2 |
| Independent | 167 | 0.5% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 23 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 30,717 | 100.0% | 13 | 100.0% | 13 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Full ward-by-ward results for 2026 →
Composition history
One row per opencouncildata annual snapshot — the council at the end of each year (after that year's elections, by-elections and defections). Newest first; hover any seat for the party.
Ward by ward
Each row is a ward, each column a cycle. Each cell shows the top-of-poll candidate's party (swatch) and their share of valid ballots. Wards are matched by name across cycles — boundary reviews can mean a ward of the same name is a slightly different area in a later cycle.
| Ward | 2016 | 2018 | 2019 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 | 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brereton and Ravenhill | 32% | 40% | 43% | 42% | 37% | 48% | 65% | 51% |
| Cannock East | 45% | 50% | 42% | 51% | 45% | 72% | ||
| Cannock Longford and Bridgtown | 48% | 53% | ||||||
| Cannock North | 53% | 62% | 53% | 46% | 46% | 57% | ||
| Cannock Park and Old Fallow | 47% | 54% | ||||||
| Cannock South | 47% | 46% | 39% | 51% | 45% | 46% | ||
| Cannock West | 52% | 69% | 63% | 69% | 60% | 58% | ||
| Chadsmoor | 61% | 61% | ||||||
| Etching Hill and the Heath | 33% | 55% | 60% | 68% | 48% | 52% | 48% | 46% |
| Hagley | 48% | 41% | 44% | 63% | ||||
| Hawks Green | 36% | 59% | 44% | 57% | 46% | 51% | ||
| Hawks Green with Rumer Hill | 44% | 50% | ||||||
| Heath Hayes and Wimblebury | 50% | 59% | ||||||
| Heath Hayes East and Wimblebury | 40% | 44% | 37% | 54% | 41% | 47% | ||
| Hednesford Green Heath | 48% | 34% | 42% | 54% | 56% | 53% | ||
| Hednesford Hills and Rawnsley | 57% | 49% | ||||||
| Hednesford North | 48% | 46% | 42% | 39% | 36% | 38% | ||
| Hednesford Pye Green | 42% | 56% | ||||||
| Hednesford South | 43% | 61% | 48% | 42% | ||||
| Norton Canes | 39% | 54% | 45% | 56% | 61% | 67% | 72% | 60% |
| Rawnsley | 37% | 56% | 54% | 70% | ||||
| Western Springs | 35% | 52% | 54% | 56% | 57% | 47% | 52% | 48% |