← Havant (all cycles) · 2 May 2024 cohort
Havant 2024
Local elections held 2 May 2024.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 12 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 36 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative Party | 26,370 | 37.5% | 13 | 36.1% | 14 | 38.9% | -1 |
| Liberal Democrats | 14,455 | 20.6% | 7 | 19.4% | 7 | 19.4% | 0 |
| Green Party | 13,646 | 19.4% | 4 | 11.1% | 7 | 19.4% | -3 |
| Labour Party | 12,923 | 18.4% | 10 | 27.8% | 7 | 19.4% | +3 |
| Reform UK | 2,471 | 3.5% | 2 | 5.6% | 1 | 2.8% | +1 |
| Independent | 441 | 0.6% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 70,306 | 100.0% | 36 | 100.0% | 36 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2024 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2024 election (current) and on the eve of it (2023), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Leigh Park Central and West Leigh · 3 seats · won at 33.3% · above quota
- Bedhampton · 3 seats · won at 36.2% · above quota
- Hayling East · 3 seats · won at 37.2% · above quota
- Leigh Park Hermitage · 3 seats · won at 39.8% · above quota
- Purbrook · 3 seats · won at 45.9% · above quota
- Emsworth · 3 seats · won at 46.8% · above quota
- Stakes · 3 seats · won at 47.2% · above quota
- Hart Plain · 3 seats · won at 47.5% · above quota
- Waterloo · 3 seats · won at 53.7% · above quota
- Havant St Faith's · 3 seats · won at 53.9% · above quota
- Cowplain · 3 seats · won at 54.4% · above quota
- Hayling West · 3 seats · won at 60.6% · above quota
Race results
Leigh Park Central and West Leigh · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 33.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +8.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,290
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Horton, J. | Labour Party | 655 | 16.9% | 50.8% | +25.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Faiz, M. | Labour Party | 521 | 13.5% | 40.4% | +15.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Collings, S. | Reform UK | 430 | 11.1% | 33.3% | +8.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Rennie, A. | Conservative Party | 420 | 10.9% | 32.6% | — | |
| 5 | Stone, R. | Conservative Party | 415 | 10.7% | 32.2% | — | |
| 6 | Arnold, C. | Green Party | 363 | 9.4% | 28.1% | — | |
| 7 | Tindall, K. | Conservative Party | 338 | 8.7% | 26.2% | — | |
| 8 | Lowe, J. | Liberal Democrats | 279 | 7.2% | 21.6% | — | |
| 9 | Dunford, G. | Liberal Democrats | 238 | 6.2% | 18.5% | — | |
| 10 | Carpenter, M. | Independent | 210 | 5.4% | 16.3% | — |
Bedhampton · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 36.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +11.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,119
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gray, P. | Liberal Democrats | 1,159 | 18.2% | 54.7% | +29.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Lind, M. | Liberal Democrats | 887 | 14.0% | 41.9% | +16.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Fairhurst, L. | Conservative Party | 767 | 12.1% | 36.2% | +11.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Martin, A. | Liberal Democrats | 739 | 11.6% | 34.9% | — | |
| 5 | Inkster, M. | Conservative Party | 650 | 10.2% | 30.7% | — | |
| 6 | Hughes, T. | Conservative Party | 576 | 9.1% | 27.2% | — | |
| 7 | Collins, M. | Reform UK | 493 | 7.8% | 23.3% | — | |
| 8 | Pearson, P. | Labour Party | 450 | 7.1% | 21.2% | — | |
| 9 | Graham, J. | Green Party | 348 | 5.5% | 16.4% | — | |
| 10 | Lanchester, R. | Green Party | 288 | 4.5% | 13.6% | — |
Hayling East · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 37.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,253
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Coates, M. | Labour Party | 1,459 | 21.6% | 64.8% | +39.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Shepherd, N. | Green Party | 992 | 14.7% | 44.0% | +19.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Oliver, P. | Labour Party | 839 | 12.4% | 37.2% | +12.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Hartridge, G. | Conservative Party | 806 | 11.9% | 35.8% | — | |
| 5 | Parker, N. | Green Party | 751 | 11.1% | 33.3% | — | |
| 6 | Cundliffe, E. | Conservative Party | 732 | 10.8% | 32.5% | — | |
| 7 | Attryde, S. | Conservative Party | 610 | 9.0% | 27.1% | — | |
| 8 | Valentine, J. | Green Party | 570 | 8.4% | 25.3% | — |
Leigh Park Hermitage · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 39.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 957
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brown, R. | Labour Party | 499 | 17.4% | 52.1% | +27.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Redsull, A. | Labour Party | 472 | 16.4% | 49.3% | +24.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Rhodes, V. | Reform UK | 381 | 13.3% | 39.8% | +14.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Branson, J. | Conservative Party | 358 | 12.5% | 37.4% | — | |
| 5 | Crellin, P. | Conservative Party | 346 | 12.0% | 36.1% | — | |
| 6 | Weeks, Y. | Conservative Party | 337 | 11.7% | 35.2% | — | |
| 7 | Piper, R. | Green Party | 252 | 8.8% | 26.3% | — | |
| 8 | Miller, M. | Liberal Democrats | 227 | 7.9% | 23.7% | — |
Purbrook · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 45.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,746
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Harrison, A. | Liberal Democrats | 979 | 18.7% | 56.1% | +31.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Tansom, P. | Liberal Democrats | 933 | 17.8% | 53.4% | +28.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Diamond, C. | Conservative Party | 802 | 15.3% | 45.9% | +20.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Norton, T. | Conservative Party | 725 | 13.8% | 41.5% | — | |
| 5 | Patel, H. | Conservative Party | 705 | 13.5% | 40.4% | — | |
| 6 | Kneller, G. | Liberal Democrats | 649 | 12.4% | 37.2% | — | |
| 7 | James, S. | Green Party | 444 | 8.5% | 25.4% | — |
Emsworth · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 46.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +21.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,546
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rason, G. | Green Party | 2,457 | 23.1% | 69.3% | +44.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Mychaleckyj, R. | Green Party | 1,976 | 18.6% | 55.7% | +30.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Robert, C. | Green Party | 1,660 | 15.6% | 46.8% | +21.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Kennett, R. | Conservative Party | 1,364 | 12.8% | 38.5% | — | |
| 5 | Bowerman, L. | Conservative Party | 1,177 | 11.1% | 33.2% | — | |
| 6 | Lawrence, L. | Conservative Party | 954 | 9.0% | 26.9% | — | |
| 7 | Bolt, M. | Liberal Democrats | 477 | 4.5% | 13.5% | — | |
| 8 | David, J. | Reform UK | 287 | 2.7% | 8.1% | — | |
| 9 | Bowman, A. | Liberal Democrats | 285 | 2.7% | 8.0% | — |
Stakes · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 47.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,321
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lloyd, E. | Conservative Party | 741 | 18.7% | 56.1% | +31.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Milne, S. | Conservative Party | 682 | 17.2% | 51.6% | +26.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hagan, S. | Labour Party | 624 | 15.7% | 47.2% | +22.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Patrick, D. | Conservative Party | 599 | 15.1% | 45.3% | — | |
| 5 | Hill, D. | Labour Party | 501 | 12.6% | 37.9% | — | |
| 6 | Briley, P. | Green Party | 420 | 10.6% | 31.8% | — | |
| 7 | Ward, C. | Liberal Democrats | 396 | 10.0% | 30.0% | — |
Hart Plain · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 47.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,376
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Briggs, A. | Conservative Party | 777 | 18.8% | 56.5% | +31.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Shimbart, E. | Conservative Party | 768 | 18.6% | 55.8% | +30.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Blades, J. | Conservative Party | 654 | 15.8% | 47.5% | +22.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Ashley, J. | Liberal Democrats | 570 | 13.8% | 41.4% | — | |
| 5 | Colman, J. | Labour Party | 563 | 13.6% | 40.9% | — | |
| 6 | May, P. | Green Party | 432 | 10.5% | 31.4% | — | |
| 7 | Harvey, J. | Reform UK | 365 | 8.8% | 26.5% | — |
Waterloo · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 53.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +28.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,733
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brent, R. | Conservative Party | 1,023 | 19.7% | 59.0% | +34.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Wade, P. | Conservative Party | 977 | 18.8% | 56.4% | +31.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Robinson, G. | Conservative Party | 930 | 17.9% | 53.7% | +28.7 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Briggs, J. | Liberal Democrats | 529 | 10.2% | 30.5% | — | |
| 5 | Corps, D. | Labour Party | 503 | 9.7% | 29.0% | — | |
| 6 | Plunkett, O. | Green Party | 484 | 9.3% | 27.9% | — | |
| 7 | Pratley, J. | Liberal Democrats | 417 | 8.0% | 24.1% | — | |
| 8 | Attewell, N. | Green Party | 335 | 6.4% | 19.3% | — |
Havant St Faith's · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 53.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +28.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,910
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Munday, P. | Labour Party | 1,845 | 21.1% | 63.4% | +38.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Harris, G. | Labour Party | 1,728 | 19.8% | 59.4% | +34.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Berwick, D. | Labour Party | 1,568 | 18.0% | 53.9% | +28.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Dyer, J. | Conservative Party | 846 | 9.7% | 29.1% | — | |
| 5 | Chilcott, N. | Conservative Party | 785 | 9.0% | 27.0% | — | |
| 6 | Knowles, M. | Conservative Party | 630 | 7.2% | 21.6% | — | |
| 7 | Saunders, N. | Green Party | 582 | 6.7% | 20.0% | — | |
| 8 | Etherington, D. | Reform UK | 515 | 5.9% | 17.7% | — | |
| 9 | Harris, G. | Independent | 231 | 2.6% | 7.9% | — |
Cowplain · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 54.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +29.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,566
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Keast, D. | Conservative Party | 1,021 | 21.7% | 65.2% | +40.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Bowdell, N. | Conservative Party | 870 | 18.5% | 55.6% | +30.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Briggs, A. | Conservative Party | 852 | 18.1% | 54.4% | +29.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | McGannan, W. | Labour Party | 696 | 14.8% | 44.4% | — | |
| 5 | Holman, B. | Green Party | 650 | 13.8% | 41.5% | — | |
| 6 | Notley, C. | Liberal Democrats | 609 | 13.0% | 38.9% | — |
Hayling West · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 60.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +35.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,619
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gray, P. | Liberal Democrats | 1,818 | 23.1% | 69.4% | +44.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Forrow, W. | Liberal Democrats | 1,678 | 21.4% | 64.1% | +39.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hulls, J. | Liberal Democrats | 1,586 | 20.2% | 60.6% | +35.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Richardson, J. | Conservative Party | 784 | 10.0% | 29.9% | — | |
| 5 | Linger, B. | Conservative Party | 765 | 9.7% | 29.2% | — | |
| 6 | Rees, E. | Conservative Party | 584 | 7.4% | 22.3% | — | |
| 7 | Bradbury, A. | Green Party | 367 | 4.7% | 14.0% | — | |
| 8 | Soar, R. | Green Party | 275 | 3.5% | 10.5% | — |