← Merton (all cycles) · 5 May 2022 cohort
Merton 2022
Local elections held 5 May 2022.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 20 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 57 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labour Party | 70,423 | 41.9% | 31 | 54.4% | 24 | 42.1% | +7 |
| Conservative Party | 43,382 | 25.8% | 7 | 12.3% | 15 | 26.3% | -8 |
| Liberal Democrats | 41,655 | 24.8% | 17 | 29.8% | 14 | 24.6% | +3 |
| Green Party | 8,712 | 5.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 3 | 5.3% | -3 |
| RES | 3,576 | 2.1% | 2 | 3.5% | 1 | 1.8% | +1 |
| Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 164 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 167,912 | 100.0% | 57 | 100.0% | 57 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2022 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2022 election (current) and on the eve of it (2021), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Wandle · 2 seats · won at 34.4% · above quota
- Hillside · 2 seats · won at 41.0% · above quota
- Cannon Hill · 3 seats · won at 34.0% · above quota
- Abbey · 3 seats · won at 34.9% · above quota
- West Barnes · 3 seats · won at 39.1% · above quota
- Wimbledon Park · 3 seats · won at 40.8% · above quota
- Lower Morden · 3 seats · won at 44.0% · above quota
- Raynes Park · 3 seats · won at 45.0% · above quota
- Merton Park · 2 seats · won at 57.7% · above quota
- Village · 3 seats · won at 49.7% · above quota
- Wimbledon Town and Dundonald · 3 seats · won at 52.0% · above quota
- Colliers Wood · 3 seats · won at 53.7% · above quota
- St Helier · 3 seats · won at 57.6% · above quota
- Lavender Fields · 3 seats · won at 62.9% · above quota
- Longthornton · 3 seats · won at 64.7% · above quota
- Ravensbury · 3 seats · won at 64.8% · above quota
- Cricket Green · 3 seats · won at 72.3% · above quota
- Graveney · 3 seats · won at 72.7% · above quota
- Figge's Marsh · 3 seats · won at 74.2% · above quota
- Pollards Hill · 3 seats · won at 75.7% · above quota
Race results
Wandle · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 34.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +1.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,150
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Galea K. | Liberal Democrats | 755 | 17.6% | 35.1% | +1.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Stringer E. | Labour Party | 740 | 17.2% | 34.4% | +1.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Allison M. | Labour Party | 727 | 16.9% | 33.8% | — | |
| 4 | Ling P. | Liberal Democrats | 673 | 15.7% | 31.3% | — | |
| 5 | Lockwood G. | Conservative Party | 513 | 11.9% | 23.9% | — | |
| 6 | McGrath C. | Conservative Party | 472 | 11.0% | 22.0% | — | |
| 7 | Naqshabandi M. | Green Party | 253 | 5.9% | 11.8% | — | |
| 8 | Smith B. | Green Party | 166 | 3.9% | 7.7% | — |
Hillside · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 41.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +7.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,582
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hicks S. | Liberal Democrats | 1,105 | 21.4% | 42.8% | +9.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Holden D. | Conservative Party | 1,059 | 20.5% | 41.0% | +7.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Cossins R. | Conservative Party | 1,015 | 19.7% | 39.3% | — | |
| 4 | Faulkner U. | Liberal Democrats | 1,005 | 19.5% | 38.9% | — | |
| 5 | Bottriell R. | Labour Party | 515 | 10.0% | 19.9% | — | |
| 6 | Hirsch S. | Labour Party | 464 | 9.0% | 18.0% | — |
Cannon Hill · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 34.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +9.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,510
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gould J. | Liberal Democrats | 1,329 | 12.6% | 37.9% | +12.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | McLean N. | Conservative Party | 1,263 | 12.0% | 36.0% | +11.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Paterson M. | Conservative Party | 1,193 | 11.3% | 34.0% | +9.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Ashraf A. | Liberal Democrats | 1,168 | 11.1% | 33.3% | — | |
| 5 | Pocock F. | Conservative Party | 1,140 | 10.8% | 32.5% | — | |
| 6 | Poole R. | Liberal Democrats | 1,129 | 10.7% | 32.2% | — | |
| 7 | Barnes D. | Labour Party | 1,049 | 10.0% | 29.9% | — | |
| 8 | Cowper P. | Labour Party | 984 | 9.3% | 28.0% | — | |
| 9 | Barnett R. | Labour Party | 977 | 9.3% | 27.8% | — | |
| 10 | Henderson J. | Green Party | 299 | 2.8% | 8.5% | — |
Abbey · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 34.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +9.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,323
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Braithwaite J. | Liberal Democrats | 1,294 | 13.0% | 38.9% | +13.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Brunt M. | Labour Party | 1,169 | 11.7% | 35.2% | +10.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Dresselaers K. | Liberal Democrats | 1,160 | 11.6% | 34.9% | +9.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Smith B. | Liberal Democrats | 1,151 | 11.5% | 34.6% | — | |
| 5 | Peck K. | Labour Party | 1,133 | 11.4% | 34.1% | — | |
| 6 | Dada Z. | Labour Party | 1,089 | 10.9% | 32.8% | — | |
| 7 | Benbow N. | Conservative Party | 927 | 9.3% | 27.9% | — | |
| 8 | Ormrod H. | Conservative Party | 858 | 8.6% | 25.8% | — | |
| 9 | Ranjan S. | Conservative Party | 796 | 8.0% | 24.0% | — | |
| 10 | Garrett P. | Green Party | 391 | 3.9% | 11.8% | — |
West Barnes · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 39.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,448
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bokhari H. | Liberal Democrats | 1,655 | 16.0% | 48.0% | +23.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Oliver J. | Liberal Democrats | 1,612 | 15.6% | 46.7% | +21.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Page R. | Liberal Democrats | 1,348 | 13.0% | 39.1% | +14.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Lewis-Lavender G. | Conservative Party | 1,114 | 10.8% | 32.3% | — | |
| 5 | Alimi L. | Conservative Party | 1,038 | 10.0% | 30.1% | — | |
| 6 | Hackett J. | Conservative Party | 1,034 | 10.0% | 30.0% | — | |
| 7 | Todd T. | Labour Party | 711 | 6.9% | 20.6% | — | |
| 8 | Newbery R. | Labour Party | 701 | 6.8% | 20.3% | — | |
| 9 | Butler B. | Labour Party | 691 | 6.7% | 20.0% | — | |
| 10 | Barraball J. | Green Party | 441 | 4.3% | 12.8% | — |
Wimbledon Park · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 40.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,330
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hall J. | Liberal Democrats | 1,451 | 14.5% | 43.6% | +18.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | MacArthur S. | Liberal Democrats | 1,377 | 13.8% | 41.3% | +16.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Reiss T. | Liberal Democrats | 1,358 | 13.6% | 40.8% | +15.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Gretton E. | Conservative Party | 1,056 | 10.6% | 31.7% | — | |
| 5 | Moulton O. | Conservative Party | 1,053 | 10.5% | 31.6% | — | |
| 6 | Howard J. | Conservative Party | 988 | 9.9% | 29.7% | — | |
| 7 | Constant H. | Labour Party | 783 | 7.8% | 23.5% | — | |
| 8 | Treanor P. | Labour Party | 711 | 7.1% | 21.3% | — | |
| 9 | Rahman M. | Labour Party | 621 | 6.2% | 18.6% | — | |
| 10 | Boyd J. | Green Party | 593 | 5.9% | 17.8% | — |
Lower Morden · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 44.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,487
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kenny S. | Labour Party | 1,778 | 17.0% | 51.0% | +26.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Williscroft J. | Labour Party | 1,599 | 15.3% | 45.9% | +20.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Cox E. | Conservative Party | 1,536 | 14.7% | 44.0% | +19.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Hassan M. | Labour Party | 1,531 | 14.6% | 43.9% | — | |
| 5 | Cunningham A. | Conservative Party | 1,490 | 14.2% | 42.7% | — | |
| 6 | Bogle J. | Conservative Party | 1,469 | 14.0% | 42.1% | — | |
| 7 | Astrand M. | Green Party | 384 | 3.7% | 11.0% | — | |
| 8 | Luck G. | Liberal Democrats | 271 | 2.6% | 7.8% | — | |
| 9 | Miles N. | Liberal Democrats | 216 | 2.1% | 6.2% | — | |
| 10 | Bernard Tanqueray J. | Liberal Democrats | 187 | 1.8% | 5.4% | — |
Raynes Park · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 45.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,900
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wilson V. | Liberal Democrats | 1,819 | 15.5% | 46.6% | +21.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Flack C. | Liberal Democrats | 1,796 | 15.4% | 46.1% | +21.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Willis M. | Liberal Democrats | 1,753 | 15.0% | 45.0% | +20.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Dean D. | Conservative Party | 1,287 | 11.0% | 33.0% | — | |
| 5 | Bush A. | Conservative Party | 1,264 | 10.8% | 32.4% | — | |
| 6 | Bush O. | Conservative Party | 1,223 | 10.5% | 31.4% | — | |
| 7 | Hooper B. | Labour Party | 767 | 6.6% | 19.7% | — | |
| 8 | Busbridge W. | Labour Party | 707 | 6.0% | 18.1% | — | |
| 9 | Platts H. | Labour Party | 662 | 5.7% | 17.0% | — | |
| 10 | Gay P. | Green Party | 421 | 3.6% | 10.8% | — |
Merton Park · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 57.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,986
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Foley E. | RES | 1,853 | 31.0% | 62.1% | +28.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Mercer S. | RES | 1,723 | 28.9% | 57.7% | +24.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Chadwick D. | Labour Party | 575 | 9.6% | 19.3% | — | |
| 4 | Harris A. | Labour Party | 498 | 8.3% | 16.7% | — | |
| 5 | Latif A. | Conservative Party | 346 | 5.8% | 11.6% | — | |
| 6 | Latif N. | Conservative Party | 333 | 5.6% | 11.2% | — | |
| 7 | Maddison E. | Liberal Democrats | 293 | 4.9% | 9.8% | — | |
| 8 | Oxford C. | Liberal Democrats | 177 | 3.0% | 5.9% | — | |
| 9 | O'Brien K. | Green Party | 173 | 2.9% | 5.8% | — |
Village · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 49.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +24.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,724
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Barlow T. | Conservative Party | 1,931 | 17.3% | 51.9% | +26.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Austin M. | Conservative Party | 1,909 | 17.1% | 51.3% | +26.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Howard A. | Conservative Party | 1,850 | 16.6% | 49.7% | +24.7 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Kirman F. | Liberal Democrats | 1,254 | 11.2% | 33.7% | — | |
| 5 | Gallagher A. | Liberal Democrats | 1,223 | 10.9% | 32.8% | — | |
| 6 | Williams T. | Liberal Democrats | 1,166 | 10.4% | 31.3% | — | |
| 7 | Pritchard S. | Labour Party | 495 | 4.4% | 13.3% | — | |
| 8 | Ofeimu F. | Labour Party | 465 | 4.2% | 12.5% | — | |
| 9 | Thomas G. | Labour Party | 445 | 4.0% | 12.0% | — | |
| 10 | Timpson S. | Green Party | 433 | 3.9% | 11.6% | — |
Wimbledon Town and Dundonald · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 52.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +27.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 4,334
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kohler P. | Liberal Democrats | 2,637 | 20.3% | 60.8% | +35.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Fairclough A. | Liberal Democrats | 2,463 | 18.9% | 56.8% | +31.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | McGrath S. | Liberal Democrats | 2,252 | 17.3% | 52.0% | +27.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Grocott S. | Conservative Party | 1,144 | 8.8% | 26.4% | — | |
| 5 | Holmes J. | Conservative Party | 1,053 | 8.1% | 24.3% | — | |
| 6 | Bull M. | Conservative Party | 1,041 | 8.0% | 24.0% | — | |
| 7 | Jones A. | Labour Party | 704 | 5.4% | 16.2% | — | |
| 8 | Daniels T. | Labour Party | 583 | 4.5% | 13.5% | — | |
| 9 | Collins L. | Green Party | 572 | 4.4% | 13.2% | — | |
| 10 | Paul D. | Labour Party | 553 | 4.3% | 12.8% | — |
Colliers Wood · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 53.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +28.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,910
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cooper-Marbiah C. | Labour Party | 1,907 | 21.8% | 65.5% | +40.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Attawar L. | Labour Party | 1,809 | 20.7% | 62.2% | +37.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Neaverson S. | Labour Party | 1,563 | 17.9% | 53.7% | +28.7 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Geraghty P. | Green Party | 855 | 9.8% | 29.4% | — | |
| 5 | Walsh T. | Green Party | 696 | 8.0% | 23.9% | — | |
| 6 | Todd H. | Conservative Party | 400 | 4.6% | 13.7% | — | |
| 7 | White D. | Conservative Party | 369 | 4.2% | 12.7% | — | |
| 8 | Markham K. | Conservative Party | 359 | 4.1% | 12.3% | — | |
| 9 | Robertson E. | Liberal Democrats | 276 | 3.2% | 9.5% | — | |
| 10 | Gupta S. | Liberal Democrats | 265 | 3.0% | 9.1% | — | |
| 11 | Kenny J. | Liberal Democrats | 230 | 2.6% | 7.9% | — |
St Helier · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 57.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +32.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,184
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dollimore H. | Labour Party | 1,393 | 21.3% | 63.8% | +38.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Judge A. | Labour Party | 1,262 | 19.3% | 57.8% | +32.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Pearce D. | Labour Party | 1,258 | 19.2% | 57.6% | +32.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Barlow O. | Conservative Party | 475 | 7.2% | 21.7% | — | |
| 5 | Crowe S. | Conservative Party | 415 | 6.3% | 19.0% | — | |
| 6 | Maslin P. | Green Party | 386 | 5.9% | 17.7% | — | |
| 7 | Bokth I. | Conservative Party | 380 | 5.8% | 17.4% | — | |
| 8 | Brooks R. | Green Party | 340 | 5.2% | 15.6% | — | |
| 9 | Rae J. | Green Party | 227 | 3.5% | 10.4% | — | |
| 10 | Vella V. | Liberal Democrats | 151 | 2.3% | 6.9% | — | |
| 11 | Shillito R. | Liberal Democrats | 149 | 2.3% | 6.8% | — | |
| 12 | Weston G. | Liberal Democrats | 117 | 1.8% | 5.4% | — |
Lavender Fields · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 62.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +37.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,211
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Macauley E. | Labour Party | 1,608 | 24.2% | 72.7% | +47.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Christie B. | Labour Party | 1,580 | 23.8% | 71.5% | +46.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Szczepanski S. | Labour Party | 1,390 | 21.0% | 62.9% | +37.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Alagaratnam R. | Conservative Party | 420 | 6.3% | 19.0% | — | |
| 5 | Cahill A. | Conservative Party | 395 | 6.0% | 17.9% | — | |
| 6 | Burridge G. | Green Party | 365 | 5.5% | 16.5% | — | |
| 7 | Rushton F. | Conservative Party | 322 | 4.9% | 14.6% | — | |
| 8 | Barker E. | Liberal Democrats | 271 | 4.1% | 12.3% | — | |
| 9 | Parritt S. | Liberal Democrats | 166 | 2.5% | 7.5% | — | |
| 10 | Fletcher B. | Liberal Democrats | 117 | 1.8% | 5.3% | — |
Longthornton · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 64.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +39.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,449
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fraser B. | Labour Party | 1,869 | 25.4% | 76.3% | +51.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Garrod R. | Labour Party | 1,662 | 22.6% | 67.9% | +42.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Skeete M. | Labour Party | 1,584 | 21.6% | 64.7% | +39.7 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Lewis-Lavender B. | Conservative Party | 453 | 6.2% | 18.5% | — | |
| 5 | Willie D. | Conservative Party | 425 | 5.8% | 17.4% | — | |
| 6 | Ormrod M. | Conservative Party | 417 | 5.7% | 17.0% | — | |
| 7 | Boyd L. | Green Party | 332 | 4.5% | 13.6% | — | |
| 8 | Jones S. | Liberal Democrats | 217 | 3.0% | 8.9% | — | |
| 9 | Harris N. | Liberal Democrats | 198 | 2.7% | 8.1% | — | |
| 10 | Beheshtizadeh K. | Liberal Democrats | 191 | 2.6% | 7.8% | — |
Ravensbury · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 64.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +39.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,079
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Charles C. | Labour Party | 1,504 | 24.1% | 72.4% | +47.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Alambritis S. | Labour Party | 1,497 | 24.0% | 72.0% | +47.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | McCabe P. | Labour Party | 1,346 | 21.6% | 64.8% | +39.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Holmes S. | Conservative Party | 385 | 6.2% | 18.5% | — | |
| 5 | Holdt R. | Conservative Party | 355 | 5.7% | 17.1% | — | |
| 6 | Moulton T. | Conservative Party | 337 | 5.4% | 16.2% | — | |
| 7 | O'Hara K. | Green Party | 294 | 4.7% | 14.1% | — | |
| 8 | Weber S. | Liberal Democrats | 192 | 3.1% | 9.2% | — | |
| 9 | Harbron S. | Liberal Democrats | 173 | 2.8% | 8.3% | — | |
| 10 | Norbrook H. | Liberal Democrats | 153 | 2.5% | 7.4% | — |
Cricket Green · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 72.3% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +47.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,454
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Manly G. | Labour Party | 1,816 | 24.7% | 74.0% | +49.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Butcher M. | Labour Party | 1,788 | 24.3% | 72.9% | +47.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Kaweesa U. | Labour Party | 1,774 | 24.1% | 72.3% | +47.3 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Mansfield B. | Conservative Party | 433 | 5.9% | 17.6% | — | |
| 5 | Watkinson G. | Conservative Party | 351 | 4.8% | 14.3% | — | |
| 6 | Ludvigsen P. | Conservative Party | 348 | 4.7% | 14.2% | — | |
| 7 | Stanton C. | Green Party | 274 | 3.7% | 11.2% | — | |
| 8 | Bolt V. | Liberal Democrats | 196 | 2.7% | 8.0% | — | |
| 9 | Morrison G. | Liberal Democrats | 182 | 2.5% | 7.4% | — | |
| 10 | Woodward W. | Liberal Democrats | 121 | 1.6% | 4.9% | — | |
| 11 | Forbes A. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 80 | 1.1% | 3.3% | — |
Graveney · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 72.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +47.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,763
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kirby L. | Labour Party | 2,182 | 26.3% | 79.0% | +54.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Bhim S. | Labour Party | 2,097 | 25.3% | 75.9% | +50.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hayes B. | Labour Party | 2,009 | 24.2% | 72.7% | +47.7 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Stevens R. | Green Party | 422 | 5.1% | 15.3% | — | |
| 5 | Altman L. | Conservative Party | 385 | 4.6% | 13.9% | — | |
| 6 | Hammond S. | Conservative Party | 363 | 4.4% | 13.1% | — | |
| 7 | Bonsu Osei R. | Conservative Party | 323 | 3.9% | 11.7% | — | |
| 8 | Peace C. | Liberal Democrats | 199 | 2.4% | 7.2% | — | |
| 9 | Ho Y. | Liberal Democrats | 166 | 2.0% | 6.0% | — | |
| 10 | Mukadam Q. | Liberal Democrats | 142 | 1.7% | 5.1% | — |
Figge's Marsh · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 74.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +49.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,363
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Akyigyina A. | Labour Party | 1,962 | 27.7% | 83.0% | +58.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Irons N. | Labour Party | 1,882 | 26.5% | 79.6% | +54.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Johnson D. | Labour Party | 1,753 | 24.7% | 74.2% | +49.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Taylor L. | Conservative Party | 293 | 4.1% | 12.4% | — | |
| 5 | Hammond A. | Conservative Party | 267 | 3.8% | 11.3% | — | |
| 6 | Williamson T. | Conservative Party | 257 | 3.6% | 10.9% | — | |
| 7 | Pannifex S. | Green Party | 221 | 3.1% | 9.4% | — | |
| 8 | Bailey E. | Liberal Democrats | 152 | 2.1% | 6.4% | — | |
| 9 | Raymond J. | Liberal Democrats | 115 | 1.6% | 4.9% | — | |
| 10 | Thomas N. | Liberal Democrats | 103 | 1.5% | 4.4% | — | |
| 11 | Ashley A. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 84 | 1.2% | 3.6% | — |
Pollards Hill · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 75.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +50.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,357
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Henry J. | Labour Party | 1,930 | 27.3% | 81.9% | +56.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Whelton M. | Labour Party | 1,786 | 25.3% | 75.8% | +50.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Mundy A. | Labour Party | 1,785 | 25.2% | 75.7% | +50.7 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Amona D. | Conservative Party | 366 | 5.2% | 15.5% | — | |
| 5 | Cole A. | Conservative Party | 351 | 5.0% | 14.9% | — | |
| 6 | Mitchell B. | Conservative Party | 343 | 4.9% | 14.6% | — | |
| 7 | Rogers M. | Green Party | 174 | 2.5% | 7.4% | — | |
| 8 | Borrow T. | Liberal Democrats | 125 | 1.8% | 5.3% | — | |
| 9 | Jane Jeanes M. | Liberal Democrats | 122 | 1.7% | 5.2% | — | |
| 10 | Payne M. | Liberal Democrats | 89 | 1.3% | 3.8% | — |