← South Holland (all cycles) · 4 May 2023 cohort
South Holland 2023
Local elections held 4 May 2023.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 18 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 37 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative Party | 18,974 | 53.5% | 19 | 51.4% | 21 | 56.8% | -2 |
| SH IND | 10,470 | 29.5% | 15 | 40.5% | 11 | 29.7% | +4 |
| Independent | 4,206 | 11.9% | 3 | 8.1% | 4 | 10.8% | -1 |
| Green Party | 1,221 | 3.4% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 2.7% | -1 |
| Labour Party | 401 | 1.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Reform UK | 212 | 0.6% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 35,484 | 100.0% | 37 | 100.0% | 37 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2023 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2023 election (current) and on the eve of it (2022), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Gedney · 1 seat · won at 60.7% · above quota
- Spalding Castle · 1 seat · won at 64.7% · above quota
- Fleet · 1 seat · won at 65.6% · above quota
- Holbeach Town · 3 seats · won at 40.9% · above quota
- Spalding Wygate · 2 seats · won at 49.5% · above quota
- Spalding St. Marys · 2 seats · won at 51.6% · above quota
- Sutton Bridge · 2 seats · won at 56.0% · above quota
- Spalding Monks House · 2 seats · won at 56.0% · above quota
- Holbeach Hurn · 1 seat · won at 73.7% · above quota
- Spalding St. Pauls · 2 seats · won at 58.8% · above quota
- The Saints · 1 seat · won at 76.8% · above quota
- Donington Quadring and Gosberton · 3 seats · won at 53.0% · above quota
- Spalding St. Johns · 2 seats · won at 67.6% · above quota
- Whaplode and Holbeach St. Johns · 2 seats · won at 69.7% · above quota
- Pinchbeck and Surfleet · 3 seats · won at 63.2% · above quota
- Crowland and Deeping St. Nicholas · 3 seats · won at 66.8% · above quota
- Long Sutton · 3 seats · won at 69.9% · above quota
- Moulton Weston and Cowbit · 3 seats · won at 79.9% · above quota
Race results
Gedney · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 60.7% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +10.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 476
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Reynolds, J. | Conservative Party | 289 | 60.7% | +10.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Stancer, M. | SH IND | 187 | 39.3% | — |
Spalding Castle · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 64.7% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 518
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Taylor, G. | Conservative Party | 335 | 64.7% | +14.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Blake, M. | Green Party | 183 | 35.3% | — |
Fleet · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 65.6% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 569
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Barnes, P. | SH IND | 373 | 65.6% | +15.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | McNally, E. | Conservative Party | 196 | 34.4% | — |
Holbeach Town · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 40.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +15.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,362
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Carter, T. | Conservative Party | 959 | 23.5% | 70.4% | +45.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hutchinson, S. | SH IND | 734 | 18.0% | 53.9% | +28.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Chapman, N. | Conservative Party | 557 | 13.6% | 40.9% | +15.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Foyster, P. | SH IND | 523 | 12.8% | 38.4% | — | |
| 5 | Rudkin, G. | Independent | 496 | 12.1% | 36.4% | — | |
| 6 | Chandler, M. | Conservative Party | 484 | 11.8% | 35.5% | — | |
| 7 | Biggadike, F. | Independent | 332 | 8.1% | 24.4% | — |
Spalding Wygate · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 49.5% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +16.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 854
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whitbourn, J. | Conservative Party | 473 | 27.7% | 55.4% | +22.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Spencer, A. | SH IND | 423 | 24.8% | 49.5% | +16.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Gambba-Jones, R. | Conservative Party | 411 | 24.1% | 48.1% | — | |
| 4 | Forman, A. | Labour Party | 401 | 23.5% | 47.0% | — |
Spalding St. Marys · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 51.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 916
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Le Sage, M. | SH IND | 559 | 30.5% | 61.1% | +27.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Ashby, D. | SH IND | 472 | 25.8% | 51.6% | +18.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hayes, W. | Conservative Party | 432 | 23.6% | 47.2% | — | |
| 4 | Porter, G. | Conservative Party | 368 | 20.1% | 40.2% | — |
Sutton Bridge · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 56.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 881
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Booth, M. | SH IND | 540 | 30.6% | 61.3% | +28.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Brewis, C. | SH IND | 493 | 28.0% | 56.0% | +22.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Coupland, P. | Conservative Party | 381 | 21.6% | 43.2% | — | |
| 4 | Marchant, L. | Conservative Party | 348 | 19.8% | 39.5% | — |
Spalding Monks House · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 56.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 936
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chauhan, S. | SH IND | 604 | 32.3% | 64.6% | +31.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Sheard, I. | SH IND | 524 | 28.0% | 56.0% | +22.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Timewell, S. | Conservative Party | 468 | 25.0% | 50.0% | — | |
| 4 | Gemmell, V. | Conservative Party | 275 | 14.7% | 29.4% | — |
Holbeach Hurn · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 73.7% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 449
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Worth, C. | Conservative Party | 331 | 73.7% | +23.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Blackman, W. | Green Party | 118 | 26.3% | — |
Spalding St. Pauls · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 58.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 655
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gibson, R. | SH IND | 458 | 35.0% | 70.0% | +36.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Boulding, B. | SH IND | 385 | 29.4% | 58.8% | +25.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Scalese, G. | Conservative Party | 269 | 20.6% | 41.1% | — | |
| 4 | Sutton, C. | Conservative Party | 197 | 15.0% | 30.1% | — |
The Saints · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 76.8% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 682
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Eldridge, L. | Conservative Party | 524 | 76.8% | +26.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Seymour, M. | Independent | 158 | 23.2% | — |
Donington Quadring and Gosberton · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 53.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +28.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,192
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | King, J. | SH IND | 856 | 23.9% | 71.8% | +46.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Bingham, H. | Conservative Party | 737 | 20.6% | 61.8% | +36.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Geaney, M. | Conservative Party | 631 | 17.7% | 53.0% | +28.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Walsh, S. | SH IND | 597 | 16.7% | 50.1% | — | |
| 5 | Johnson, C. | Conservative Party | 542 | 15.2% | 45.5% | — | |
| 6 | Swainson, M. | Reform UK | 212 | 5.9% | 17.8% | — |
Spalding St. Johns · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 67.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +34.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 905
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hasan, M. | SH IND | 732 | 40.5% | 80.9% | +47.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Le Sage, J. | SH IND | 611 | 33.8% | 67.6% | +34.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Sneath, E. | Conservative Party | 242 | 13.4% | 26.8% | — | |
| 4 | Savage, A. | Conservative Party | 224 | 12.4% | 24.8% | — |
Whaplode and Holbeach St. Johns · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 69.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +36.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 797
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Beal, A. | Conservative Party | 615 | 38.6% | 77.2% | +43.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Redgate, P. | Conservative Party | 555 | 34.8% | 69.7% | +36.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Griffen, H. | SH IND | 423 | 26.6% | 53.1% | — |
Pinchbeck and Surfleet · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 63.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +38.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,233
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sneath, E. | Conservative Party | 904 | 24.4% | 73.3% | +48.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Avery, J. | Conservative Party | 886 | 23.9% | 71.8% | +46.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Slade, S. | Conservative Party | 780 | 21.1% | 63.2% | +38.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Moore, T. | Independent | 699 | 18.9% | 56.7% | — | |
| 5 | Jenkins, S. | Green Party | 431 | 11.6% | 34.9% | — |
Crowland and Deeping St. Nicholas · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 66.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +41.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 864
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Astill, J. | Conservative Party | 770 | 29.7% | 89.1% | +64.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Alcock, B. | Independent | 757 | 29.2% | 87.6% | +62.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Harrison, A. | Conservative Party | 577 | 22.3% | 66.8% | +41.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Cook-Nykyforczuk, A. | Green Party | 489 | 18.9% | 56.6% | — |
Long Sutton · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 69.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +44.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,118
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tennant, A. | Independent | 982 | 29.3% | 87.8% | +62.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Tyrrell, J. | Conservative Party | 967 | 28.8% | 86.5% | +61.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Wilkinson, D. | Independent | 782 | 23.3% | 69.9% | +44.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Thompson, D. | Conservative Party | 624 | 18.6% | 55.8% | — |
Moulton Weston and Cowbit · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 79.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +54.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,200
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Casson, A. | Conservative Party | 1,006 | 28.0% | 83.9% | +58.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Sneath, T. | SH IND | 976 | 27.1% | 81.4% | +56.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Woolf, A. | Conservative Party | 958 | 26.6% | 79.9% | +54.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Grocock, R. | Conservative Party | 659 | 18.3% | 54.9% | — |