← St. Helens (all cycles) · 5 May 2022 cohort
St. Helens 2022
Local elections held 5 May 2022.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 18 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 48 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labour Party | 50,667 | 52.5% | 29 | 60.4% | 26 | 54.2% | +3 |
| Independent | 14,839 | 15.4% | 7 | 14.6% | 7 | 14.6% | 0 |
| Green Party | 11,368 | 11.8% | 6 | 12.5% | 5 | 10.4% | +1 |
| Conservative Party | 9,889 | 10.3% | 2 | 4.2% | 5 | 10.4% | -3 |
| Liberal Democrats | 9,531 | 9.9% | 4 | 8.3% | 5 | 10.4% | -1 |
| FBM | 176 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 96,470 | 100.0% | 48 | 100.0% | 48 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2022 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2022 election (current) and on the eve of it (2021), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Peasley Cross and Fingerpost · 1 seat · won at 60.6% · above quota
- Sutton South East · 2 seats · won at 53.2% · above quota
- Newton-le-Willows West · 3 seats · won at 45.8% · above quota
- Bold and Lea Green · 3 seats · won at 48.5% · above quota
- Billinge and Seneley Green · 3 seats · won at 50.7% · above quota
- Sutton North West · 2 seats · won at 62.8% · above quota
- Haydock · 3 seats · won at 58.8% · above quota
- Rainhill · 3 seats · won at 60.7% · above quota
- Windle · 3 seats · won at 61.7% · above quota
- Rainford · 2 seats · won at 72.3% · above quota
- Moss Bank · 3 seats · won at 65.6% · above quota
- Blackbrook · 3 seats · won at 66.2% · above quota
- Newton-le-Willows East · 3 seats · won at 66.6% · above quota
- Town Centre St Helens · 2 seats · won at 75.6% · above quota
- Thatto Heath · 3 seats · won at 76.9% · above quota
- Eccleston · 3 seats · won at 77.6% · above quota
- Parr · 3 seats · won at 81.7% · above quota
- West Park · 3 seats · won at 82.0% · above quota
Race results
Peasley Cross and Fingerpost · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 60.6% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +10.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 536
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | O'Connor D. | Labour Party | 325 | 60.6% | +10.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Brown I. | Conservative Party | 107 | 20.0% | — | |
| 3 | Donnelly A. | Green Party | 104 | 19.4% | — |
Sutton South East · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 53.2% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +19.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,108
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Spencer B. | Liberal Democrats | 816 | 36.8% | 73.7% | +40.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Johnson J. | Labour Party | 589 | 26.6% | 53.2% | +19.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Johnson A. | Labour Party | 560 | 25.3% | 50.6% | — | |
| 4 | Gupta D. | Conservative Party | 250 | 11.3% | 22.6% | — |
Newton-le-Willows West · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 45.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,599
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Maguire T. | Independent | 1,670 | 21.4% | 64.3% | +39.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Collier K. | Independent | 1,302 | 16.7% | 50.1% | +25.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Banks D. | Labour Party | 1,190 | 15.3% | 45.8% | +20.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Banks J. | Labour Party | 1,182 | 15.2% | 45.5% | — | |
| 5 | Smith C. | Independent | 1,153 | 14.8% | 44.4% | — | |
| 6 | Davidson A. | Labour Party | 1,063 | 13.6% | 40.9% | — | |
| 7 | Dockerty A. | Conservative Party | 237 | 3.0% | 9.1% | — |
Bold and Lea Green · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 48.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,311
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hawley D. | Green Party | 1,209 | 17.4% | 52.3% | +27.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Makin A. | Green Party | 1,176 | 17.0% | 50.9% | +25.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Richards G. | Green Party | 1,120 | 16.2% | 48.5% | +23.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Housley J. | Labour Party | 1,084 | 15.6% | 46.9% | — | |
| 5 | Preston L. | Labour Party | 1,032 | 14.9% | 44.7% | — | |
| 6 | Preston C. | Labour Party | 983 | 14.2% | 42.5% | — | |
| 7 | Woodcock B. | Conservative Party | 329 | 4.7% | 14.2% | — |
Billinge and Seneley Green · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 50.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,666
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Peers P. | Independent | 1,424 | 17.8% | 53.4% | +28.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Murphy S. | Labour Party | 1,388 | 17.4% | 52.1% | +27.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Betts C. | Independent | 1,352 | 16.9% | 50.7% | +25.7 pts | Elected |
| 4 | McDonnell D. | Labour Party | 1,220 | 15.3% | 45.8% | — | |
| 5 | Webster M. | Independent | 988 | 12.4% | 37.1% | — | |
| 6 | Cross G. | Labour Party | 980 | 12.3% | 36.8% | — | |
| 7 | Gibney D. | Conservative Party | 646 | 8.1% | 24.2% | — |
Sutton North West · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 62.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +29.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,025
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Campbell N. | Labour Party | 645 | 31.5% | 63.0% | +29.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hodkinson J. | Labour Party | 643 | 31.4% | 62.8% | +29.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Williams F. | Green Party | 441 | 21.5% | 43.0% | — | |
| 4 | Skeetch D. | Conservative Party | 320 | 15.6% | 31.2% | — |
Haydock · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 58.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +33.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,309
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hooton P. | Green Party | 1,485 | 21.4% | 64.3% | +39.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Sheldon J. | Green Party | 1,445 | 20.9% | 62.6% | +37.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Van Der Burg D. | Green Party | 1,357 | 19.6% | 58.8% | +33.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Butterworth M. | Labour Party | 834 | 12.0% | 36.1% | — | |
| 5 | Pritchard P. | Labour Party | 762 | 11.0% | 33.0% | — | |
| 6 | Sample A. | Labour Party | 756 | 10.9% | 32.7% | — | |
| 7 | Collins J. | Conservative Party | 287 | 4.1% | 12.4% | — |
Rainhill · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 60.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +35.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,398
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tasker J. | Independent | 2,336 | 22.9% | 68.7% | +43.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Greaves D. | Independent | 2,133 | 20.9% | 62.8% | +37.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Stevenson K. | Independent | 2,062 | 20.2% | 60.7% | +35.7 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Rustidge K. | Labour Party | 1,179 | 11.6% | 34.7% | — | |
| 5 | Davies E. | Labour Party | 1,122 | 11.0% | 33.0% | — | |
| 6 | Grunewald B. | Labour Party | 1,029 | 10.1% | 30.3% | — | |
| 7 | Spriggs H. | Conservative Party | 333 | 3.3% | 9.8% | — |
Windle · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 61.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +36.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,951
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Baines D. | Labour Party | 1,503 | 25.7% | 77.0% | +52.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Clarke L. | Labour Party | 1,391 | 23.8% | 71.3% | +46.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Uddin M. | Labour Party | 1,204 | 20.6% | 61.7% | +36.7 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Donnelly A. | Green Party | 999 | 17.1% | 51.2% | — | |
| 5 | Cunliffe J. | Conservative Party | 756 | 12.9% | 38.7% | — |
Rainford · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 72.3% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +39.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,006
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Case J. | Conservative Party | 1,462 | 36.4% | 72.9% | +39.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Mussell A. | Conservative Party | 1,450 | 36.2% | 72.3% | +39.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Tabern J. | Labour Party | 1,099 | 27.4% | 54.8% | — |
Moss Bank · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 65.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +40.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,095
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dickinson T. | Labour Party | 1,547 | 24.6% | 73.8% | +48.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Long T. | Labour Party | 1,476 | 23.5% | 70.5% | +45.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Begum Z. | Labour Party | 1,375 | 21.9% | 65.6% | +40.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Harvey M. | Conservative Party | 514 | 8.2% | 24.5% | — | |
| 5 | Kent D. | Liberal Democrats | 494 | 7.9% | 23.6% | — | |
| 6 | Kent J. | Liberal Democrats | 460 | 7.3% | 22.0% | — | |
| 7 | Wilcock P. | Independent | 419 | 6.7% | 20.0% | — |
Blackbrook · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 66.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +41.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,897
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Burns A. | Labour Party | 1,309 | 23.0% | 69.0% | +44.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | McQuade P. | Labour Party | 1,262 | 22.2% | 66.5% | +41.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Maloney L. | Labour Party | 1,255 | 22.1% | 66.2% | +41.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Van Der Burg E. | Green Party | 715 | 12.6% | 37.7% | — | |
| 5 | Northey J. | Green Party | 707 | 12.4% | 37.3% | — | |
| 6 | Lee M. | Conservative Party | 442 | 7.8% | 23.3% | — |
Newton-le-Willows East · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 66.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +41.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,344
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bell J. | Labour Party | 1,701 | 24.2% | 72.6% | +47.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Laird K. | Labour Party | 1,599 | 22.7% | 68.2% | +43.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Gomez-Aspron S. | Labour Party | 1,560 | 22.2% | 66.6% | +41.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Smith D. | Liberal Democrats | 1,393 | 19.8% | 59.4% | — | |
| 5 | Cunliffe L. | Conservative Party | 778 | 11.1% | 33.2% | — |
Town Centre St Helens · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 75.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +42.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 926
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | McCormack A. | Labour Party | 747 | 40.3% | 80.7% | +47.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Sweeney M. | Labour Party | 700 | 37.8% | 75.6% | +42.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Ashcroft N. | Conservative Party | 229 | 12.4% | 24.7% | — | |
| 4 | Oakes T. | FBM | 176 | 9.5% | 19.0% | — |
Thatto Heath · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 76.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +51.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,713
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Charlton N. | Labour Party | 1,372 | 26.7% | 80.1% | +55.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hattersley R. | Labour Party | 1,330 | 25.9% | 77.7% | +52.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | McCauley R. | Labour Party | 1,317 | 25.6% | 76.9% | +51.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Price T. | Green Party | 610 | 11.9% | 35.6% | — | |
| 5 | Peet S. | Conservative Party | 509 | 9.9% | 29.7% | — |
Eccleston · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 77.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +52.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,497
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Haw M. | Liberal Democrats | 2,252 | 30.1% | 90.2% | +65.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Sims T. | Liberal Democrats | 2,178 | 29.1% | 87.2% | +62.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Pearl G. | Liberal Democrats | 1,938 | 25.9% | 77.6% | +52.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Jones G. | Labour Party | 732 | 9.8% | 29.3% | — | |
| 5 | France M. | Conservative Party | 391 | 5.2% | 15.7% | — |
Parr · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 81.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +56.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,180
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bowden A. | Labour Party | 1,172 | 33.1% | 99.4% | +74.4 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Groucutt K. | Labour Party | 1,079 | 30.5% | 91.5% | +66.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Osundeko B. | Labour Party | 964 | 27.2% | 81.7% | +56.7 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Wilcock M. | Conservative Party | 324 | 9.2% | 27.5% | — |
West Park · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 82.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +57.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,644
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Quinn M. | Labour Party | 1,543 | 31.3% | 93.9% | +68.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Bond M. | Labour Party | 1,516 | 30.7% | 92.2% | +67.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Long D. | Labour Party | 1,348 | 27.3% | 82.0% | +57.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Barton R. | Conservative Party | 525 | 10.6% | 31.9% | — |