← Tewkesbury (all cycles) · 4 May 2023 cohort
Tewkesbury 2023
Local elections held 4 May 2023.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 20 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 38 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative Party | 16,216 | 34.3% | 9 | 23.7% | 13 | 34.2% | -4 |
| Liberal Democrats | 15,232 | 32.2% | 16 | 42.1% | 13 | 34.2% | +3 |
| Green Party | 7,049 | 14.9% | 4 | 10.5% | 6 | 15.8% | -2 |
| Independent | 4,292 | 9.1% | 7 | 18.4% | 3 | 7.9% | +4 |
| T & T IND | 2,345 | 5.0% | 2 | 5.3% | 2 | 5.3% | 0 |
| Labour Party | 2,200 | 4.6% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 2.6% | -1 |
| Total | 47,334 | 100.0% | 38 | 100.0% | 38 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2023 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2023 election (current) and on the eve of it (2022), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Severn Vale North · 1 seat · won at 46.1% · −3.9 pts below quota
- Cleeve Grange · 1 seat · won at 49.4% · −0.6 pts below quota
- Badgeworth · 1 seat · won at 51.2% · above quota
- Northway · 2 seats · won at 35.9% · above quota
- Shurdington · 1 seat · won at 54.7% · above quota
- Isbourne · 2 seats · won at 40.7% · above quota
- Cleeve St Michael's · 2 seats · won at 42.8% · above quota
- Innsworth · 2 seats · won at 45.6% · above quota
- Severn Vale South · 1 seat · won at 64.1% · above quota
- Winchcombe · 3 seats · won at 42.6% · above quota
- Cleeve West · 2 seats · won at 52.1% · above quota
- Cleeve Hill · 2 seats · won at 54.0% · above quota
- Highnam with Haw Bridge · 2 seats · won at 59.1% · above quota
- Brockworth West · 2 seats · won at 61.6% · above quota
- Tewkesbury East · 2 seats · won at 61.6% · above quota
- Brockworth East · 2 seats · won at 65.9% · above quota
- Tewkesbury South · 2 seats · won at 67.4% · above quota
- Churchdown Brookfield with Hucclecote · 3 seats · won at 59.4% · above quota
- Churchdown St John's · 3 seats · won at 61.6% · above quota
- Tewkesbury North and Twyning · 2 seats · won at 72.1% · above quota
Race results
Severn Vale North · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 46.1% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −3.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 787
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mclain, H. | Conservative Party | 363 | 46.1% | −3.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Lacey, D. | Liberal Democrats | 310 | 39.4% | — | |
| 3 | Billington, S. | Green Party | 114 | 14.5% | — |
Cleeve Grange · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 49.4% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. −0.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 676
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Budge, T. | Liberal Democrats | 334 | 49.4% | −0.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Barriskell, A. | Conservative Party | 243 | 35.9% | — | |
| 3 | Boyd, C. | Labour Party | 67 | 9.9% | — | |
| 4 | Franklin, S. | Green Party | 32 | 4.7% | — |
Badgeworth · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 51.2% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +1.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 678
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vines, R. | Conservative Party | 347 | 51.2% | +1.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Yates, C. | Liberal Democrats | 331 | 48.8% | — |
Northway · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 35.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +2.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 765
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mactiernan, E. | Independent | 348 | 22.7% | 45.5% | +12.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Godwin, P. | Conservative Party | 275 | 18.0% | 35.9% | +2.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Fancourt, G. | Liberal Democrats | 269 | 17.6% | 35.2% | — | |
| 4 | Castle, F. | Labour Party | 233 | 15.2% | 30.5% | — | |
| 5 | Cromwell, K. | Conservative Party | 218 | 14.2% | 28.5% | — | |
| 6 | Guyll, K. | Liberal Democrats | 187 | 12.2% | 24.4% | — |
Shurdington · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 54.7% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +4.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 647
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Porter, G. | Liberal Democrats | 354 | 54.7% | +4.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Surman, P. | Conservative Party | 293 | 45.3% | — |
Isbourne · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 40.7% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +7.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,107
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Coleman, C. | Independent | 719 | 32.5% | 65.0% | +31.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Gore, M. | Conservative Party | 450 | 20.3% | 40.7% | +7.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Smith, D. | Conservative Party | 384 | 17.3% | 34.7% | — | |
| 4 | Taylor, P. | Liberal Democrats | 300 | 13.6% | 27.1% | — | |
| 5 | Baddams, J. | Green Party | 164 | 7.4% | 14.8% | — | |
| 6 | Levett, M. | Labour Party | 100 | 4.5% | 9.0% | — | |
| 7 | White, C. | Green Party | 97 | 4.4% | 8.8% | — |
Cleeve St Michael's · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 42.8% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +9.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,232
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hegenbarth, A. | Liberal Democrats | 771 | 31.3% | 62.6% | +29.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Pervaiz, K. | Liberal Democrats | 527 | 21.4% | 42.8% | +9.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | East, B. | Conservative Party | 446 | 18.1% | 36.2% | — | |
| 4 | Reece, A. | Conservative Party | 403 | 16.4% | 32.7% | — | |
| 5 | Peake, J. | Labour Party | 148 | 6.0% | 12.0% | — | |
| 6 | Aubury, K. | Green Party | 93 | 3.8% | 7.5% | — | |
| 7 | Bown, M. | Green Party | 76 | 3.1% | 6.2% | — |
Innsworth · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 45.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +12.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 998
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hands, S. | Liberal Democrats | 485 | 24.3% | 48.6% | +15.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Ockelton, P. | Liberal Democrats | 455 | 22.8% | 45.6% | +12.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Bocking, G. | Conservative Party | 414 | 20.7% | 41.5% | — | |
| 4 | Rai, R. | Conservative Party | 338 | 16.9% | 33.9% | — | |
| 5 | Davies, V. | Labour Party | 237 | 11.9% | 23.7% | — | |
| 6 | Evans, R. | Independent | 67 | 3.4% | 6.7% | — |
Severn Vale South · single-seat
Marginal winner Winning candidate's share of valid ballots. 64.1% Proportional quota 50.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +14.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 1 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 730
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Williams, M. | Conservative Party | 468 | 64.1% | +14.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Griffiths, M. | Liberal Democrats | 182 | 24.9% | — | |
| 3 | Hyett, D. | Green Party | 80 | 11.0% | — |
Winchcombe · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 42.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +17.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,913
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mason, J. | Conservative Party | 958 | 16.7% | 50.1% | +25.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Gray, D. | Conservative Party | 834 | 14.5% | 43.6% | +18.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Madle, G. | Independent | 814 | 14.2% | 42.6% | +17.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Murphy, J. | Conservative Party | 784 | 13.7% | 41.0% | — | |
| 5 | Sturgeon, S. | Labour Party | 514 | 9.0% | 26.9% | — | |
| 6 | Hurley, J. | Labour Party | 373 | 6.5% | 19.5% | — | |
| 7 | Corsie, C. | Green Party | 334 | 5.8% | 17.5% | — | |
| 8 | Reford, S. | Liberal Democrats | 327 | 5.7% | 17.1% | — | |
| 9 | Galey, S. | Green Party | 304 | 5.3% | 15.9% | — | |
| 10 | Mackinnon, T. | Liberal Democrats | 294 | 5.1% | 15.4% | — | |
| 11 | Walters, M. | Green Party | 203 | 3.5% | 10.6% | — |
Cleeve West · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 52.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +18.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,422
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stanley, R. | Liberal Democrats | 988 | 34.8% | 69.5% | +36.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Stewart, M. | Liberal Democrats | 740 | 26.0% | 52.1% | +18.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Bird, R. | Conservative Party | 426 | 15.0% | 30.0% | — | |
| 4 | Ross, W. | Conservative Party | 359 | 12.6% | 25.3% | — | |
| 5 | Harrison, E. | Labour Party | 158 | 5.6% | 11.1% | — | |
| 6 | North, A. | Green Party | 101 | 3.6% | 7.1% | — | |
| 7 | Wheeler, S. | Green Party | 71 | 2.5% | 5.0% | — |
Cleeve Hill · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 54.0% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +20.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,667
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Adcock, N. | Liberal Democrats | 943 | 28.3% | 56.6% | +23.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Agg, L. | Liberal Democrats | 901 | 27.0% | 54.0% | +20.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Berliner, K. | Conservative Party | 811 | 24.3% | 48.7% | — | |
| 4 | Dean, M. | Conservative Party | 679 | 20.4% | 40.7% | — |
Highnam with Haw Bridge · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 59.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +25.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,337
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Smith, J. | Conservative Party | 912 | 34.1% | 68.2% | +34.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | McLain, P. | Conservative Party | 790 | 29.5% | 59.1% | +25.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Bristow, J. | Green Party | 504 | 18.8% | 37.7% | — | |
| 4 | Millett, J. | Green Party | 468 | 17.5% | 35.0% | — |
Brockworth West · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 61.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +28.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 975
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Harwood, D. | Independent | 671 | 34.4% | 68.9% | +35.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Carter, C. | Independent | 600 | 30.8% | 61.6% | +28.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Oliver, S. | Liberal Democrats | 259 | 13.3% | 26.6% | — | |
| 4 | Barwick, M. | Conservative Party | 254 | 13.0% | 26.1% | — | |
| 5 | Bocking, K. | Conservative Party | 165 | 8.5% | 16.9% | — |
Tewkesbury East · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 61.6% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +28.3 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,367
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bowman, H. | Green Party | 899 | 32.9% | 65.8% | +32.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Sundarajoo, H. | Green Party | 842 | 30.8% | 61.6% | +28.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Smith, V. | Conservative Party | 536 | 19.6% | 39.2% | — | |
| 4 | Reid, C. | Conservative Party | 456 | 16.7% | 33.4% | — |
Brockworth East · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 65.9% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +32.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 725
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mills, C. | Independent | 595 | 41.0% | 82.1% | +48.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Mills, J. | Independent | 478 | 33.0% | 65.9% | +32.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Khazeni-Rad, K. | Liberal Democrats | 161 | 11.1% | 22.2% | — | |
| 4 | Hill, M. | Conservative Party | 108 | 7.4% | 14.9% | — | |
| 5 | Hill, J. | Conservative Party | 108 | 7.4% | 14.9% | — |
Tewkesbury South · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 67.4% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +34.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,190
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cody, C. | Green Party | 1,025 | 43.1% | 86.1% | +52.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Dimond-Brown, M. | Green Party | 802 | 33.7% | 67.4% | +34.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Coffey, T. | Conservative Party | 259 | 10.9% | 21.8% | — | |
| 4 | Darlington, Z. | Labour Party | 153 | 6.4% | 12.9% | — | |
| 5 | Collins, D. | Conservative Party | 141 | 5.9% | 11.8% | — |
Churchdown Brookfield with Hucclecote · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 59.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +34.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,511
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Smith, R. | Liberal Democrats | 944 | 20.8% | 62.5% | +37.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Smith, P. | Liberal Democrats | 926 | 20.4% | 61.3% | +36.3 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Yates, G. | Liberal Democrats | 898 | 19.8% | 59.4% | +34.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Blackwell, G. | Conservative Party | 529 | 11.7% | 35.0% | — | |
| 5 | Grierson, P. | Conservative Party | 459 | 10.1% | 30.4% | — | |
| 6 | Furolo, R. | Conservative Party | 332 | 7.3% | 22.0% | — | |
| 7 | Totterdell, J. | Green Party | 158 | 3.5% | 10.5% | — | |
| 8 | Allen, G. | Green Party | 147 | 3.2% | 9.7% | — | |
| 9 | Milne, C. | Green Party | 141 | 3.1% | 9.3% | — |
Churchdown St John's · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 61.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +36.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,601
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jordan, M. | Liberal Democrats | 1,097 | 22.8% | 68.5% | +43.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Dove, S. | Liberal Democrats | 1,015 | 21.1% | 63.4% | +38.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Skelt, L. | Liberal Democrats | 986 | 20.5% | 61.6% | +36.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Evans, J. | Conservative Party | 501 | 10.4% | 31.3% | — | |
| 5 | Szlowieniec, G. | Conservative Party | 420 | 8.7% | 26.2% | — | |
| 6 | Gray, M. | Conservative Party | 391 | 8.1% | 24.4% | — | |
| 7 | Blackledge, A. | Green Party | 149 | 3.1% | 9.3% | — | |
| 8 | Cavallaro, G. | Green Party | 123 | 2.6% | 7.7% | — | |
| 9 | Dendulk, H. | Green Party | 122 | 2.5% | 7.6% | — |
Tewkesbury North and Twyning · 2-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~2× smaller. 72.1% Proportional quota 33.3% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +38.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 2 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,586
This is a 2-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~2×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 2, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 2 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 2. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sztymiak, M. | T & T IND | 1,202 | 37.9% | 75.8% | +42.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Workman, P. | T & T IND | 1,143 | 36.0% | 72.1% | +38.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Robertson, E. | Labour Party | 217 | 6.8% | 13.7% | — | |
| 4 | Gilder, J. | Conservative Party | 183 | 5.8% | 11.5% | — | |
| 5 | Gilder, G. | Conservative Party | 179 | 5.6% | 11.3% | — | |
| 6 | Usmar, K. | Liberal Democrats | 142 | 4.5% | 9.0% | — | |
| 7 | Evans, B. | Liberal Democrats | 106 | 3.3% | 6.7% | — |