← All councils

West Lancashire

Every election cycle we have data for, most recent first.

8 cycles in our data
21.3% all-time seats elected below the quota (36 of 169)
7.1% all-time seats unfairly awarded (12 of 169 across 8 cycles)

Cycles

Council composition as of 2026

45 councillors, by party. One square per seat. Source: opencouncildata annual snapshot — reflects the council at the end of 2026 (after that year's elections, by-elections and defections). Hover any seat for the party.

Most recent election (2026)

In 2026, 15 seats were up across 15 wards. The table below shows what each party actually won — alongside what they would have won if the 15 seats had been shared in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.

PartyVotesVote %Seats won% of seatsProportional seatsProportional %Δ
Reform UK11,65032.0%746.7%533.3%+2
Our West Lancashire6,80018.7%533.3%320.0%+2
Labour Party6,30417.3%00.0%320.0%-3
Conservative Party6,28917.3%320.0%320.0%0
Green Party4,15011.4%00.0%16.7%-1
Liberal Democrats7372.0%00.0%00.0%0
Your Party4501.2%00.0%00.0%0
Total36,380100.0%15100.0%15100.0%0

Vote share vs seats won

The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.

Vote share
Actual seats
Proportional seats

Full ward-by-ward results for 2026 →

Composition history

One row per opencouncildata annual snapshot — the council at the end of each year (after that year's elections, by-elections and defections). Newest first; hover any seat for the party.

2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016

Ward by ward

Each row is a ward, each column a cycle. Each cell shows the top-of-poll candidate's party (swatch) and their share of valid ballots. Wards are matched by name across cycles — boundary reviews can mean a ward of the same name is a slightly different area in a later cycle.

Ward20162018201920212022202320242026
Ashurst72%75%55%60%81%
Aughton and Downholland58%56%53%46%48%
Aughton and Holborn55%41%39%
Aughton Park63%68%51%
Bickerstaffe67%
Birch Green89%59%67%
Burscough Bridge and Rufford57%36%29%
Burscough East58%51%48%57%
Burscough Town60%56%40%
Burscough West63%66%43%46%
Derby42%47%64%48%46%
Digmoor93%50%67%
Halsall43%52%
Hesketh-with-Becconsall63%60%76%59%
Knowsley51%51%42%44%50%
Moorside91%89%62%87%
Newburgh75%69%
North Meols55%49%59%
North Meols and Hesketh Bank66%50%52%
Old Skelmersdale94%77%43%
Ormskirk East54%43%43%
Ormskirk West52%46%42%
Parbold65%69%60%
Rufford72%73%
Rural North East52%55%36%
Rural South50%48%41%
Rural West50%34%47%
Scarisbrick69%65%62%
Scott43%45%58%43%51%
Skelmersdale North90%55%73%90%76%39%
Skelmersdale South81%81%56%64%73%90%91%34%
Tanhouse85%56%86%
Tanhouse and Skelmersdale Town Centre88%77%42%
Tarleton67%69%76%72%58%
Tarleton Village64%56%46%
Up Holland68%55%58%59%64%74%62%40%
Wrightington54%50%57%53%