← Wolverhampton (all cycles) · 4 May 2023 cohort
Wolverhampton 2023
Local elections held 4 May 2023.
Each race compares the marginal winner's share of valid ballots to the proportional quota — the share they'd need under any common proportional method. How the numbers are derived →
If votes were counted by party
Across the 20 wards in this cycle, parties received the vote totals below. The proportional column shows what each party would have won if the 60 seats had been shared out in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.
| Party | Votes | Vote % | Seats won | % of seats | Proportional seats | Proportional % | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Labour Party | 74,536 | 57.1% | 47 | 78.3% | 35 | 58.3% | +12 |
| Conservative Party | 48,250 | 36.9% | 13 | 21.7% | 22 | 36.7% | -9 |
| Liberal Democrats | 4,273 | 3.3% | 0 | 0.0% | 2 | 3.3% | -2 |
| Green Party | 2,953 | 2.3% | 0 | 0.0% | 1 | 1.7% | -1 |
| Independent | 324 | 0.2% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Reform UK | 164 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 89 | 0.1% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 | 0.0% | 0 |
| Total | 130,589 | 100.0% | 60 | 100.0% | 60 | 100.0% | 0 |
Vote share vs seats won
The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.
Council composition: what this election replaced
The 2023 cycle was an all-out election — every seat was contested. The two opencouncildata snapshots below show the council immediately after the 2023 election (current) and on the eve of it (2022), so you can see what the result replaced.
Wards in this council
Sorted with the largest gap below the quota first. Click any ward to jump to its full result.
- Penn · 3 seats · won at 47.6% · above quota
- Merry Hill · 3 seats · won at 47.8% · above quota
- Bushbury North · 3 seats · won at 48.5% · above quota
- Oxley · 3 seats · won at 51.0% · above quota
- Tettenhall Regis · 3 seats · won at 52.7% · above quota
- Wednesfield South · 3 seats · won at 55.0% · above quota
- Ettingshall South and Spring Vale · 3 seats · won at 56.1% · above quota
- Fallings Park · 3 seats · won at 57.2% · above quota
- Wednesfield North · 3 seats · won at 59.6% · above quota
- Park · 3 seats · won at 61.1% · above quota
- Bilston North · 3 seats · won at 62.1% · above quota
- Heath Town · 3 seats · won at 62.8% · above quota
- Tettenhall Wightwick · 3 seats · won at 63.8% · above quota
- East Park · 3 seats · won at 66.4% · above quota
- Bilston South · 3 seats · won at 67.1% · above quota
- Graiseley · 3 seats · won at 67.5% · above quota
- Bushbury South and Low Hill · 3 seats · won at 68.9% · above quota
- St Peters · 3 seats · won at 70.2% · above quota
- Ettingshall North · 3 seats · won at 71.8% · above quota
- Blakenhall · 3 seats · won at 74.0% · above quota
Race results
Penn · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 47.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,355
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hibbert, C. | Labour Party | 1,934 | 19.2% | 57.7% | +32.7 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Haynes, S. | Conservative Party | 1,800 | 17.9% | 53.7% | +28.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Singh, P. | Conservative Party | 1,596 | 15.9% | 47.6% | +22.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Hawker, K. | Labour Party | 1,550 | 15.4% | 46.2% | — | |
| 5 | Dhillon, R. | Conservative Party | 1,431 | 14.2% | 42.7% | — | |
| 6 | Naseem, M. | Labour Party | 1,358 | 13.5% | 40.5% | — | |
| 7 | Hopkins, M. | Liberal Democrats | 395 | 3.9% | 11.8% | — |
Merry Hill · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 47.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +22.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,831
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dalton, W. | Conservative Party | 1,525 | 18.0% | 53.9% | +28.9 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Hyatt, C. | Labour Party | 1,358 | 16.0% | 48.0% | +23.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Haynes, C. | Conservative Party | 1,352 | 15.9% | 47.8% | +22.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Gething, T. | Conservative Party | 1,335 | 15.7% | 47.2% | — | |
| 5 | Bains, S. | Labour Party | 1,256 | 14.8% | 44.4% | — | |
| 6 | Cook, B. | Labour Party | 1,218 | 14.3% | 43.0% | — | |
| 7 | Darke, P. | Green Party | 448 | 5.3% | 15.8% | — |
Bushbury North · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 48.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +23.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,371
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Appleby, P. | Conservative Party | 1,236 | 17.4% | 52.1% | +27.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | McNeil, A. | Conservative Party | 1,225 | 17.2% | 51.7% | +26.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Bennett, S. | Conservative Party | 1,151 | 16.2% | 48.5% | +23.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Edwards, G. | Labour Party | 1,081 | 15.2% | 45.6% | — | |
| 5 | Russell, S. | Labour Party | 1,018 | 14.3% | 42.9% | — | |
| 6 | Siarkiewicz, R. | Labour Party | 954 | 13.4% | 40.2% | — | |
| 7 | Marston, H. | Liberal Democrats | 255 | 3.6% | 10.8% | — | |
| 8 | Bamber, A. | Liberal Democrats | 194 | 2.7% | 8.2% | — |
Oxley · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 51.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +26.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,440
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Butt, A. | Labour Party | 1,329 | 18.2% | 54.5% | +29.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Francis, J. | Labour Party | 1,302 | 17.8% | 53.4% | +28.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | McGarrity, B. | Labour Party | 1,244 | 17.0% | 51.0% | +26.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Collinge, A. | Conservative Party | 996 | 13.6% | 40.8% | — | |
| 5 | Garner, S. | Conservative Party | 910 | 12.4% | 37.3% | — | |
| 6 | Harris, M. | Conservative Party | 858 | 11.7% | 35.2% | — | |
| 7 | Jenkins, I. | Liberal Democrats | 243 | 3.3% | 10.0% | — | |
| 8 | Abbes, S. | Liberal Democrats | 175 | 2.4% | 7.2% | — | |
| 9 | Ashby-Filippin, R. | Liberal Democrats | 174 | 2.4% | 7.1% | — | |
| 10 | Allerton, J. | Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition | 89 | 1.2% | 3.6% | — |
Tettenhall Regis · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 52.7% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +27.7 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,858
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Maddox, B. | Conservative Party | 1,658 | 19.3% | 58.0% | +33.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Khan, S. | Conservative Party | 1,509 | 17.6% | 52.8% | +27.8 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Singh, U. | Conservative Party | 1,506 | 17.6% | 52.7% | +27.7 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Evans, B. | Labour Party | 1,106 | 12.9% | 38.7% | — | |
| 5 | Morris, A. | Labour Party | 1,089 | 12.7% | 38.1% | — | |
| 6 | Morrison, C. | Labour Party | 1,027 | 12.0% | 35.9% | — | |
| 7 | Fellows, S. | Liberal Democrats | 397 | 4.6% | 13.9% | — | |
| 8 | Donald, J. | Liberal Democrats | 282 | 3.3% | 9.9% | — |
Wednesfield South · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 55.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +30.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,123
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brackenridge, G. | Labour Party | 1,213 | 19.0% | 57.1% | +32.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Brackenridge, C. | Labour Party | 1,168 | 18.3% | 55.0% | +30.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Coogan, J. | Labour Party | 1,167 | 18.3% | 55.0% | +30.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Wastell, L. | Conservative Party | 843 | 13.2% | 39.7% | — | |
| 5 | Dickens, P. | Conservative Party | 835 | 13.1% | 39.3% | — | |
| 6 | Randle, A. | Conservative Party | 786 | 12.3% | 37.0% | — | |
| 7 | Kijak-Davis, A. | Green Party | 194 | 3.0% | 9.1% | — | |
| 8 | Kelsey, S. | Reform UK | 164 | 2.6% | 7.7% | — |
Ettingshall South and Spring Vale · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 56.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +31.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,205
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lloyd, L. | Labour Party | 1,305 | 19.7% | 59.2% | +34.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Dehar, J. | Labour Party | 1,262 | 19.1% | 57.2% | +32.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Singh, H. | Labour Party | 1,236 | 18.7% | 56.1% | +31.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Singh, M. | Conservative Party | 892 | 13.5% | 40.5% | — | |
| 5 | Kumar, S. | Conservative Party | 836 | 12.6% | 37.9% | — | |
| 6 | Khunkhun, S. | Conservative Party | 805 | 12.2% | 36.5% | — | |
| 7 | Doorn, R. | Green Party | 279 | 4.2% | 12.7% | — |
Fallings Park · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 57.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +32.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,812
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Evans, S. | Labour Party | 1,079 | 19.8% | 59.5% | +34.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Burden, C. | Labour Party | 1,061 | 19.5% | 58.5% | +33.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Evans, V. | Labour Party | 1,037 | 19.1% | 57.2% | +32.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Dickens, J. | Conservative Party | 739 | 13.6% | 40.8% | — | |
| 5 | Williams, R. | Conservative Party | 724 | 13.3% | 39.9% | — | |
| 6 | Sahota, S. | Conservative Party | 603 | 11.1% | 33.3% | — | |
| 7 | Nixon, P. | Liberal Democrats | 194 | 3.6% | 10.7% | — |
Wednesfield North · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 59.6% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +34.6 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,930
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bateman, P. | Labour Party | 1,213 | 20.9% | 62.8% | +37.8 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Potter, R. | Labour Party | 1,153 | 19.9% | 59.7% | +34.7 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Bateman, M. | Labour Party | 1,151 | 19.9% | 59.6% | +34.6 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Williams, N. | Conservative Party | 780 | 13.5% | 40.4% | — | |
| 5 | Wastell, J. | Conservative Party | 653 | 11.3% | 33.8% | — | |
| 6 | Stepien, J. | Conservative Party | 644 | 11.1% | 33.4% | — | |
| 7 | Young, A. | Green Party | 197 | 3.4% | 10.2% | — |
Park · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 61.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +36.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,623
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Darke, C. | Labour Party | 1,743 | 22.2% | 66.5% | +41.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Collingswood, C. | Labour Party | 1,742 | 22.1% | 66.4% | +41.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Hardacre, M. | Labour Party | 1,602 | 20.4% | 61.1% | +36.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Brotherton, R. | Conservative Party | 732 | 9.3% | 27.9% | — | |
| 5 | Davies, D. | Conservative Party | 711 | 9.0% | 27.1% | — | |
| 6 | Sharma, S. | Conservative Party | 639 | 8.1% | 24.4% | — | |
| 7 | Lewis, B. | Liberal Democrats | 260 | 3.3% | 9.9% | — | |
| 8 | Gray, R. | Liberal Democrats | 247 | 3.1% | 9.4% | — | |
| 9 | Khan, A. | Liberal Democrats | 193 | 2.5% | 7.4% | — |
Bilston North · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 62.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +37.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,854
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Leach, L. | Labour Party | 1,449 | 26.0% | 78.1% | +53.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Roberts, S. | Labour Party | 1,171 | 21.0% | 63.1% | +38.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Mistry, R. | Labour Party | 1,152 | 20.7% | 62.1% | +37.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Okere, A. | Conservative Party | 572 | 10.3% | 30.8% | — | |
| 5 | Perry-Preston, D. | Conservative Party | 521 | 9.4% | 28.1% | — | |
| 6 | Ram, S. | Conservative Party | 424 | 7.6% | 22.9% | — | |
| 7 | Clark, M. | Green Party | 274 | 4.9% | 14.8% | — |
Heath Town · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 62.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +37.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,390
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jaspal, J. | Labour Party | 910 | 21.8% | 65.5% | +40.5 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Jaspal, M. | Labour Party | 903 | 21.7% | 65.0% | +40.0 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Jaspal, J. | Labour Party | 873 | 20.9% | 62.8% | +37.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Amanze, S. | Conservative Party | 416 | 10.0% | 29.9% | — | |
| 5 | Wood, A. | Conservative Party | 410 | 9.8% | 29.5% | — | |
| 6 | Banla, J. | Conservative Party | 342 | 8.2% | 24.6% | — | |
| 7 | Tano-Yeboah, K. | Green Party | 315 | 7.6% | 22.7% | — |
Tettenhall Wightwick · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 63.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +38.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 3,270
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Thompson, W. | Conservative Party | 2,178 | 22.2% | 66.6% | +41.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Crofts, J. | Conservative Party | 2,088 | 21.3% | 63.9% | +38.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Turrell, E. | Conservative Party | 2,085 | 21.3% | 63.8% | +38.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | New, L. | Labour Party | 1,043 | 10.6% | 31.9% | — | |
| 5 | Porter, D. | Labour Party | 1,009 | 10.3% | 30.9% | — | |
| 6 | Simmons, A. | Labour Party | 929 | 9.5% | 28.4% | — | |
| 7 | Cantrill, A. | Green Party | 478 | 4.9% | 14.6% | — |
East Park · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 66.4% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +41.4 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,533
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Daley, L. | Labour Party | 1,150 | 25.0% | 75.0% | +50.0 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Miles, L. | Labour Party | 1,113 | 24.2% | 72.6% | +47.6 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Muston, A. | Labour Party | 1,018 | 22.1% | 66.4% | +41.4 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Roberts, A. | Conservative Party | 298 | 6.5% | 19.4% | — | |
| 5 | Cheema, A. | Conservative Party | 295 | 6.4% | 19.2% | — | |
| 6 | Agrawal, R. | Conservative Party | 290 | 6.3% | 18.9% | — | |
| 7 | Hall, S. | Independent | 126 | 2.7% | 8.2% | — | |
| 8 | Hall, A. | Independent | 118 | 2.6% | 7.7% | — | |
| 9 | Kruczynski, M. | Green Party | 110 | 2.4% | 7.2% | — | |
| 10 | Hall, J. | Independent | 80 | 1.7% | 5.2% | — |
Bilston South · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 67.1% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +42.1 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,642
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Simkins, S. | Labour Party | 1,167 | 23.7% | 71.1% | +46.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Wildman, G. | Labour Party | 1,118 | 22.7% | 68.1% | +43.1 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Kaur, R. | Labour Party | 1,102 | 22.4% | 67.1% | +42.1 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Hammond, P. | Conservative Party | 379 | 7.7% | 23.1% | — | |
| 5 | Rogers, M. | Conservative Party | 371 | 7.5% | 22.6% | — | |
| 6 | Thompson, C. | Conservative Party | 367 | 7.4% | 22.3% | — | |
| 7 | Pringle, J. | Liberal Democrats | 176 | 3.6% | 10.7% | — | |
| 8 | Khan, A. | Liberal Democrats | 126 | 2.6% | 7.7% | — | |
| 9 | Atanasova, H. | Liberal Democrats | 121 | 2.5% | 7.4% | — |
Graiseley · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 67.5% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +42.5 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,222
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mattu, A. | Labour Party | 1,606 | 24.1% | 72.3% | +47.3 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Reynolds, J. | Labour Party | 1,541 | 23.1% | 69.4% | +44.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Sweetman, J. | Labour Party | 1,500 | 22.5% | 67.5% | +42.5 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Berry, M. | Conservative Party | 603 | 9.0% | 27.1% | — | |
| 5 | Montero, J. | Conservative Party | 502 | 7.5% | 22.6% | — | |
| 6 | Salim, M. | Conservative Party | 480 | 7.2% | 21.6% | — | |
| 7 | Bertaut, A. | Green Party | 433 | 6.5% | 19.5% | — |
Bushbury South and Low Hill · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 68.9% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +43.9 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,352
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brookfield, P. | Labour Party | 1,002 | 24.7% | 74.1% | +49.1 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Brookfield, I. | Labour Party | 979 | 24.1% | 72.4% | +47.4 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Sweet, P. | Labour Party | 931 | 23.0% | 68.9% | +43.9 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Hewitt, S. | Conservative Party | 351 | 8.7% | 26.0% | — | |
| 5 | McNeil, D. | Conservative Party | 303 | 7.5% | 22.4% | — | |
| 6 | Wastell, F. | Conservative Party | 292 | 7.2% | 21.6% | — | |
| 7 | Jenkins, A. | Liberal Democrats | 198 | 4.9% | 14.6% | — |
St Peters · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 70.2% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +45.2 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,579
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ahmed, O. | Labour Party | 1,234 | 26.1% | 78.2% | +53.2 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Azeem, Q. | Labour Party | 1,208 | 25.5% | 76.5% | +51.5 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Tahir, I. | Labour Party | 1,108 | 23.4% | 70.2% | +45.2 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Murray, D. | Liberal Democrats | 398 | 8.4% | 25.2% | — | |
| 5 | Stevenson, J. | Conservative Party | 312 | 6.6% | 19.8% | — | |
| 6 | Timms, G. | Conservative Party | 294 | 6.2% | 18.6% | — | |
| 7 | Stanley, I. | Conservative Party | 183 | 3.9% | 11.6% | — |
Ettingshall North · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 71.8% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +46.8 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 1,957
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cockayne, J. | Labour Party | 1,538 | 26.2% | 78.6% | +53.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Howl, J. | Labour Party | 1,447 | 24.6% | 73.9% | +48.9 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Russell, Z. | Labour Party | 1,405 | 23.9% | 71.8% | +46.8 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Chaggar, R. | Conservative Party | 434 | 7.4% | 22.2% | — | |
| 5 | Kumar, A. | Conservative Party | 419 | 7.1% | 21.4% | — | |
| 6 | Williams, E. | Conservative Party | 403 | 6.9% | 20.6% | — | |
| 7 | Petter, S. | Green Party | 225 | 3.8% | 11.5% | — |
Blakenhall · 3-seat (bloc vote)
Marginal winner Voter-share estimate of the lowest-vote elected candidate. Comparable to the proportional quota. The raw vote share would be ~3× smaller. 74.0% Proportional quota 25.0% Below quota Marginal winner's share minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = below; positive = above. +49.0 pts Valid ballots (est.) Estimated voters: total votes ÷ 3 seats. Source data does not publish a ballot count for this cycle. 2,182
This is a 3-seat ward under bloc vote — each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so summing candidate votes overcounts voters by ~3×. We show share of votes (matches the council's published figure) and share of voters (est.) (raw share × 3, the figure comparable to the proportional quota). Why two columns →
| Rank | Candidate | Party | Votes | Share of votes Candidate votes ÷ total votes cast in this ward. Matches the share the council publishes. | Share of voters (est.) Estimated share of voters who supported this candidate, comparable across single- and multi-seat wards. Each voter could cast up to 3 votes, so we approximate ballots as total votes ÷ 3. This is the figure compared against the proportional quota. | Below quota Each elected candidate's share of valid ballots minus the proportional quota for this race. Negative = won the seat below the quota; positive = cleared it. | Elected |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gakhal, B. | Labour Party | 1,716 | 26.2% | 78.6% | +53.6 pts | Elected |
| 2 | Singh, T. | Labour Party | 1,642 | 25.1% | 75.2% | +50.2 pts | Elected |
| 3 | Green, S. | Labour Party | 1,616 | 24.7% | 74.0% | +49.0 pts | Elected |
| 4 | Kaur, S. | Conservative Party | 490 | 7.5% | 22.5% | — | |
| 5 | Cooper, M. | Conservative Party | 438 | 6.7% | 20.1% | — | |
| 6 | Bedi, S. | Conservative Party | 400 | 6.1% | 18.3% | — | |
| 7 | Bentley, P. | Liberal Democrats | 245 | 3.7% | 11.2% | — |