← All councils

Epping Forest

Every election cycle we have data for, most recent first.

8 cycles in our data
15.3% all-time seats elected below the quota (29 of 190)
20.0% all-time seats unfairly awarded (38 of 190 across 8 cycles)

Cycles

Council composition as of 2026

54 councillors, by party. One square per seat. Source: opencouncildata annual snapshot — reflects the council at the end of 2026 (after that year's elections, by-elections and defections). Hover any seat for the party.

Most recent election (2026)

In 2026, 18 seats were up across 18 wards. The table below shows what each party actually won — alongside what they would have won if the 18 seats had been shared in proportion to votes received (how, with caveats). The Δ column is the actual seat count minus the proportional seat count — positive numbers are parties First-Past-the-Post over-represented; negative are parties it under-represented.

PartyVotesVote %Seats won% of seatsProportional seatsProportional %Δ
Reform UK18,52240.7%1161.1%950.0%+2
Conservative Party11,98026.3%422.2%527.8%-1
Liberal Democrats4,0899.0%00.0%15.6%-1
Independent Loughton Residents Association3,6868.1%316.7%15.6%+2
Labour Party3,2787.2%00.0%15.6%-1
Green Party2,4425.4%00.0%15.6%-1
Independent1,4243.1%00.0%00.0%0
English Democrats780.2%00.0%00.0%0
Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition50.0%00.0%00.0%0
Total45,504100.0%18100.0%18100.0%0

Vote share vs seats won

The top bar is each party's share of votes cast in this council. Below, one square per seat, coloured by the party that won it — first the actual First-Past-the-Post result, then what a proportional method would have produced from the same vote totals. Divergence between the bar and the actual grid is the indictment of the method.

Vote share
Actual seats
Proportional seats

Full ward-by-ward results for 2026 →

Composition history

One row per opencouncildata annual snapshot — the council at the end of each year (after that year's elections, by-elections and defections). Newest first; hover any seat for the party.

2026
2025
2024
2023
2022
2021
2020
2019
2018
2017
2016

Ward by ward

Each row is a ward, each column a cycle. Each cell shows the top-of-poll candidate's party (swatch) and their share of valid ballots. Wards are matched by name across cycles — boundary reviews can mean a ward of the same name is a slightly different area in a later cycle.

Ward20162018201920212022202320242026
Broadley Common Epping Upland and Nazeing70%
Broadley Common, Epping Upland and Nazeing72%
Buckhurst Hill East45%69%54%62%
Buckhurst Hill East and Whitebridge49%38%
Buckhurst Hill West59%48%48%58%58%44%54%35%
Chigwell Row63%80%
Chigwell Village75%77%70%49%
Chigwell with Lambourne87%51%
Chipping Ongar Greensted and Marden Ash59%58%
Chipping Ongar, Greensted and Marden Ash70%60%
Epping East63%34%
Epping Hemnall57%61%63%61%63%66%
Epping Lindsey and Thornwood Common55%44%46%59%47%55%
Epping West and Rural52%34%
Grange Hill65%58%64%69%61%38%53%33%
Hastingwood Matching and Sheering Village67%
High Ongar Willingale and the Rodings79%
High Ongar, Willingale and the Rodings71%
Lambourne75%70%
Loughton Alderton64%64%59%64%
Loughton Broadway69%79%54%62%
Loughton Fairmead85%72%63%69%89%40%
Loughton Forest57%54%56%62%72%44%
Loughton Roding84%82%67%83%99%36%
Loughton St John's82%72%92%38%
Loughton St Mary's69%66%
Loughton St. Johns68%67%
Loughton St. Marys63%68%
Lower Nazeing69%59%69%65%
Lower Sheering68%45%
Moreton and Fyfield75%79%
North Weald Bassett80%54%63%58%81%49%
Ongar72%57%
Passingford80%
Roydon71%65%
Roydon and Lower Nazeing89%47%
Rural East55%51%
Shelley49%
Theydon Bois77%64%60%51%
Theydon Bois with Passingford57%45%
Waltham Abbey High Beach60%68%
Waltham Abbey Honey Lane58%58%40%45%59%54%
Waltham Abbey North67%53%
Waltham Abbey North East58%61%64%64%56%
Waltham Abbey Paternoster51%41%60%39%
Waltham Abbey South and Rural85%50%
Waltham Abbey South West42%62%69%52%
Waltham Abbey West82%47%